|
|
 |

|

|
Business action / observations
|
|
A
Global Action Plan
Prepared
by Business with Recommendations for Governments
2nd
edition, October 1999
Collectively,
the Alliance for Global Business represents the following organisations
Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Datenverarbeitung (ADV), Austria
Asociación Española de Empresas de Tecnologías de la Información
(SEDISI), Spain
Asociación Mexicana de la Industria de Tecnologías de Información
(AMITI), Mexico
Associaçao
Industrial Portuguesa (Portuguese Industrial Association)
Associação Portugesa das Empresas de Tecnologias de Informação e
Comunicações (APESI), Portugal
Association for Consulting to Business (APP), Czech Republic
Association Française des Utilisateurs du Téléphone et des
Télécommunications, (AFUTT)
Association of Telecommunication Users (AUTEL), Spain
Association of the Computer Industry (PIKOM), Malaysia
Association Suisse d'Usagers de Télécommunicatons, (ASUT)
Associazione Nazionale Aziende Servizi Informatica e Telematica Italy
Associazione Nazionale Utenti Italiani di Telecomunicazioni (ANUIT)
Australian
Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Australian Information Industry Association (AIIA)
Australian Telecommunications Users Group (ATUG)
AUT, Czech Republic
Bangladesh Computer Samity (BCS)
Belgian Telecommunications Users Group (BELTUG)
Bundesverband
der Deutschen Industrie (Federation of
German Industries)
Bundesverband Informationstechnologien (BVITeV), Germany
Bundesvereinigung
der Deutschen Arbeitgeberverbände (Confederation of German Employers' Associations)
Cámara de Empresas de
Software y Servicios Informáticos (CESSI), Argentina
Canadian
Council for International Business
CEHIC
(Confederation of Hungarian Employers' Organisations for International
Cooperation)
Colombian Software Federation
(FEDECOLSOFT)
Computer Suppliers'
Association of Zimbabwe (COMSA)
Computing Services &
Software Association (CSSA), United Kingdom
Confederacion
de Camaras Industriales de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (CONCAMIN) (Mexican
Confederation of Chambers of Industry)
Confederacion
Espanola de Organizaciones Empresariales (Spanish Confederation of Employers'
Organisations)
Confederacion
Patronal de la Républica Mexicana (COPARMEX) (Employers Confederation of the
Mexican Republic)
Confederation
of British Industry United States Council for International Business
Confederation
of Industry of the Czech Republic
Confederazione
Generale dell'Industria Italiana (General Confederation of Italian Industry)
Dansk
Arbejdsgiverforening (Danish Employers' Confederation)
Dansk Dataforening (DDF), Denmark
Dansk
Industri (Confederation of Danish Industries)
Fédération
des Entreprises de Belgique (Federation of Belgian Industry - FEB-VBO)
Fédération
des Industriels Luxembourgeois (Federation of Luxembourg Industrialists)
Federation of Dutch Branch Associations in Information Technology
(FENIT)
Federation of Hellenic Information Technology Enterprises (SEPE)
Federation
of Korean Industries (FKI)
Federation of Korean Information Industries (FKII)
Hong Kong Information Technology Federation
(HKITF)
Hong Kong Telecommunications Users Group (HKTUG)
ICC Argentina
ICC Australia
ICC Austria
ICC Bahrain
ICC Bangladesh
ICC Belgium
ICC Brazil
ICC Burkina Faso
ICC Canada
ICC Chile
ICC
China
ICC Colombia
ICC Cyprus
ICC Denmark
ICC Ecuador
ICC Egypt
ICC Finland
ICC France
ICC Germany
ICC Ghana
ICC Greece
ICC Hungary
ICC Iceland
ICC India
ICC Indonesia
ICC Iran (Islamic Republic of)
ICC Ireland
ICC Israel
ICC Italy
ICC Japan
ICC Jordan
ICC Korea
ICC Kuwait
ICC Lebanon
ICC Lithuania
ICC Luxembourg
ICC Mexico
ICC Morocco
ICC Netherlands
ICC New Zealand
ICC Norway
ICC Peru
ICC Philippines
ICC Portugal
ICC Saudi Arabia
ICC Singapore
ICC South Africa
ICC Spain
ICC Sri Lanka
ICC Sweden
ICC Switzerland
ICC Syria
ICC Thailand
ICC Togo
ICC Tunisia
ICC Turkey
ICC Ukraine
ICC United Kingdom
ICC Uruguay
ICC Venezuela
ICC Yugoslavia
ICC Caribbean
Chinese Taipei
Business Council of ICC
Hong Kong, China Business Council of ICC
Information Service Industry Association of China, Taipei (CISA) China
Information Technology Association of America (ITAA)
Information Technology Association of Canada (ITAC)
Information Technology Association of New Zealand (ITANZ)
Information Technology Services Association (TIPAL), Finland
International Communication User Group (ICUG), Ireland
International Communications Association (ICA), USA
International Press Telecommunications Council (IPTC)
Irish
Business and Employers Confederation
Israeli Association of Software Houses (IASH)
IT Association of South Africa (ITA)
IT&C Association of Romania (ATIC)
Japan Information Service Industry Association (JISA)
Keidanren
- BIAC Japan (Federation of Economic Organisations)
Konfederacja Pracodawcow Polskich (Confederation of Polish Employers)
L’Association des Professionnels de L’Informatique de la Bureautique et
de la Telematique (APEBI), Morocco
Mongolian National Information Technology Association
Mouvement
des Entreprises de France (MEDEF) (French Enterprises Association)
Naeringslivets
Hovedorganisasjon (Confederation of Norwegian Business and Industry)
Näringslivets Telekommitté (NTK), Sweden
National Association of Software and Service Companies (NASSCOM), India
National Telecommunications User Group (NTUG), South Africa
Nederlandse vereniging van bedrijfs telecommunicatie grootgebruikers
(BTG)
New
Zealand Employers' Federation
Norsk Tele- og Informasjonsbrukerforening (NORTIB)
Polish Chamber of Information Technology and Telecommunications (Polska
Izba Informatyki i Telekomunikacji - PIIiT)
Singapore Information Technology Federation (SITF)
Sociedade de Usuários de Informática e Telecomunicações - Sao Paulo
(Sucesu-SP), Brazil
Software Industry Federation in Northern Ireland (SIF)
Svenska
Arbetsgivareföreningen (Swedish Employers' Confederation)
Sveriges
Industriförbund (Federation of Swedish Industries)
Swedish IT-companies' Organisation
AB, Sweden
Syndesmos
Ellinikon Viomichanion (Federation of Greek Industries)
Syntec Informatique, France
Telecom eV, Germany
Telecom Forum Africa Ltd
Telecommunications Managers Association (TMA), UK
Telecommunications Users Association (TUA), UK
Telecommunications Users Association of New Zealand (TUANZ)
Teollisuuden
Ja Työnantajain Keskuslitto (Confederation of Finnish Industry and Employers)
The Association of Lithuania's Information, technology,
telecommunications and office equipment (INFOBALT)
The Association of Thai Computer Industry (ATCI)
The Co-operative Society for Computers of Egypt (CSCE)
Türk
Sanayicileri ve Isadamlari Dernegi (TÜSIAD - Turkish Industrialists' and Businessmen's
Association)
Türkiye
Isveren Sendikalari Konfederasyonu (TISK Turkish Confederation of Employer
Associations)
Türkiye
Ticaret - Sanayi - Deniz Ticaret Odalari ve Borsalari Birligi (TOBB -
Union
of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Maritime Commerce and Commodity Exchanges of
Turkey)
Union
Patronale Suisse (Confederation of Swiss Employers)
Union
Suisse du Commerce et de l'Industrie – Vorort (Swiss Federation of Commerce and
Industry)
United
States Council for International Business (USCIB)
Vereinigung
Der Österreichischer Industrieller (Federation of Austrian Industry)
Vereinigung von TK-netzbetreibern des Finanzsektors (VTF), Austria
Vereniging
VNO-NCW (Confederation of Netherlands Industry and Employers VNO-NCW)
Vinnuveitendasamband
Islands (Confederation of Icelandic Employers)
This Action
Plan is supported by:
World Association of
Newspapers (WAN)
World Economic Forum
(WEF)
World
Federation of Advertisers (WFA)
World Trade Centres
Association (WTCA)
International Express
Carriers Conference (IECC)
International
Federation of Freight Forwarders' Associations (FIATA)
Eurobit
Eurocommerce
European Community
Shipowners' Association (ECSA)
European Society for
Opinion and Marketing Research (ESOMAR)
Federation of
European Direct Marketing (FEDMA)
Japan-US Business
Council
US-Japan Business
Council
Advertising Agencies'
Association of New Zealand
Advertising Standards
Authority New Zealand
Canadian Chamber of
Commerce
Canadian Council for
International Business (CCIB)
Chamber of Commerce
and Industry – Haifa and Northern Israel
Federation of German Industry (BDI)
German
Association of Chambers of Commerce and Industry (DIHT)Association of New Zealand Advertisers
German Electrical and
Electronic Manufacturers' Association (ZVEI)
German Information Technology Manufacturers’ Association
(FVIT)
Information
Technology Association of Canada (ITAC)
Keidanren
New Zealand Chambers
of Commerce
New Zealand Direct
Marketing Association
Pacific Basin
Economic Council (PBEC)
Pacific Economic
Cooperation Council (PECC) TIIF
The British
Phonographic Industry Ltd (BPI)
US Council for
International Business (USCIB)
In cooperation
with:
Association
Européenne pour la Protection des Oeuvres et services Cryptés (AEPOC)
European Brands
Association (AIM)
Internet Law and
Policy Forum (ILPF)
Table of contents
A Global Action Plan for Electronic Commerce
Prepared by Business with recommendations for Governments
I.
Introduction to the second edition................................................................... 6
Background................................................................................................. 6
This document............................................................................................. 7
II.
Fundamental principles ..................................................................................... 8
III.
An action plan...................................................................................................... 9
1. Maximising
the benefits – economic and social impacts........................ 9
Economic and social impact....................................................................... 11
Small and medium-sized enterprises............................................................ 12
Skills development..................................................................................... 12
Ensuring global participation....................................................................... 12
Infrastructure deployment........................................................................... 13
Government as model user......................................................................... 13
2.
Electronic commerce
and the information infrastructure – trade aspects, standards and Internet
names and numbers................................................................................ 14
Competition and
trade-related aspects of electronic commerce................... 14
Telecommunications competition ................................................... 14
IT equipment................................................................................. 16
Trade-related aspects of electronic
commerce................................ 16
Convergence................................................................................. 17
Standards.................................................................................................. 18
Internet names and
numbers....................................................................... 19
Domain name
system..................................................................... 19
3.
Building trust
for users and consumers................................................. 20
Protection of
personal information.............................................................. 20
Privacy and transborder flows of
data............................................. 20
Internet privacy.............................................................................. 21
Consumer trust and
content........................................................................ 22 Consumer trust22
Content......................................................................................... 23
Marketing and advertising ethics..................................................... 24
Issues relating
to confidentiality and lawful access to information.................. 25
Promotion of technology development
to ensure security................. 25
Cryptography for confidentiality...................................................... 25
Searches and subpoenas of computer
records................................ 26
Access to public domain information............................................... 26
Legal government interception of
telecommunications...................... 26
Business monitoring of its own
communications............................... 27
Electronic
authentication............................................................................. 28
Legal validity of electronic
signatures; interoperability of certificates and electronic signatures 28
Accreditation................................................................................. 30
Availability of certification
practice statements................................. 30
4.
Establishing
groundrules for the digital marketplace........................... 31
Contractual and
other legal issues............................................................... 31
Removing legal/regulatory obstacles................................................ 31
Create a new uniform legal framework............................................ 32
Jurisdiction and applicable law........................................................ 32
Incorporation by reference............................................................. 33
Transparency and availability of
proprietary and best practice legal terms, model contracts etc..................................................................................................... 33
Dispute
settlement.......................................................................... 33
Fraud and other
commercial crime.................................................. 33
Liability.......................................................................................... 34
Taxation and tariffs.................................................................................... 35
Customs
duties.............................................................................. 36 Taxation 37
Trade facilitation and
customs modernisation.............................................. 38
Private/public
sector interface......................................................... 38
Customs
modernisation.................................................................. 38
Capacity
building........................................................................... 39
Intellectual property................................................................................... 40
Copyright
and neighbouring rights................................................... 40
Trademarks................................................................................... 41
Databases...................................................................................... 41
IV.
Annex - selected industry
self-regulatory initiatives................................... 42
I. Introduction
to the second edition
Background
This second
edition of the Global Action Plan for Electronic Commerce published by the
Alliance for Global Business (AGB) reflects a number of developments in the
global discussions about electronic commerce since the first Global Action Plan
was submitted on behalf of business to the OECD Ministerial in Ottawa, Canada,
in October 1998. It also responds to a
commitment that the AGB made in Ottawa behalf of business globally to submit
evidence, after one year, that the various business actions set forth in the
Global Action Plan were being properly implemented.
In its first
edition, the Global Action Plan urged governments to rely on business
self-regulation and the voluntary use of empowering technologies as the main
drivers behind the creation of trust across the whole spectrum of users and
providers of e-commerce goods and services.
It also stated that governments should focus on the provision of a
stable and predictable environment enabling the enforcement of electronic
contracts, the protection of intellectual property and safeguarding
competition. Furthermore, the Action
Plan provided a detailed overview of which issues were the respective
responsibilities of the private and the public sectors, and included an
exemplary selection of self-regulatory projects.
The organizations
in the AGB and the many Action Plan supporters believe that implementation of
the business agenda expressed in the Action Plan is progressing on
schedule. As this update shows, in many
areas there is strong evidence that business is responding to the new environment
by providing unprecedented transparency and safeguards for consumers. Sometimes the results of such business
action can be easily quantified, but more often it is reflected in the figures
showing a rapid expansion of the use of e-commerce globally.
Self-regulation is not a new phenomenon. Throughout history, business has set its own standard rules and
practices through a variety of organisations to lower transaction costs, to
avoid and resolve conflicts, and to create consumer confidence.
The pace of change and nascent state of electronic commerce have
heightened the risks associated with premature or unnecessary government
regulation. This has increased the
responsibility of business to promote a trustworthy environment through
self-regulation and technological innovation.
Business has a strong market incentive to foster the empowerment of
users, but will only make the necessary investments if it can trust that
governments will recognise and reinforce the leadership of business in
responding to the highly dynamic nature of electronic commerce.
This document…
Part
II of this document establishes a set of fundamental principles as the
basis for the framework in which policymaking for electronic commerce should
take place.
Part
III presents a proposed framework for action that has been agreed by the
world’s leading international business organisations that are working together
to provide business leadership, in cooperation with governments and
others. The plan describes business
actions and commitments in concrete terms and identifies business expectations
of government action. It is proposed as
a reference point for all relevant business and government organisations to
contribute to the efficient and transparent development of the minimal rules
necessary for a stable and predictable electronic commerce environment.
The action plan calls for a “hands
off” approach by government on certain issues, whilst recognising that
electronic commerce raises many important public policy considerations that may
require governmental facilitation. Government intervention may be required in
such matters as intellectual property protection, taxation, and the removal of
barriers to competition in providing the underlying infrastructure. However, in other matters, business
solutions such as self-regulation and technology tools are the preferred and
more effective means than legislation to create trust in electronic commerce.
The objective of the action plan is
to provide an inventory of fundamental business views on the issues that
government must deal with and to give a clear overview of business action in
those areas where market-driven, industry-led solutions are most likely to be
found. The action plan also responds to various high-level statements made by
governments in recent years about the need for business to lead the development
of electronic commerce. Business
accepts this task and proposes this revised action plan as a mechanism for
providing such leadership in a coordinated and transparent fashion.
Part
IV of the document presents a sample compilation of successful
self-regulatory solutions currently in use or being developed, and indicates
progress made in those projects that were also featured in the first edition of
the Global Action Plan.
Finally, Part V describes the Alliance for Global Business.
It is the intent of the authors that this document be a “living
document” that evolves as electronic commerce implementation enfolds and
provides experience and new evidence of successful projects.
To this end, we renew our invitation to readers to submit comments for
improvement and, where appropriate, endorsements to:
Christiaan
van der Valk
Deputy
Director of Policy Commissions and Manager - Telecoms and E-commerce, ICC
Tel
33-1-49532913; Fax 33-1-49532859; e-mail:
cvk@iccwbo.org
II. Fundamental principles
Business believes that a number of fundamental principles should shape
the policies that govern electronic commerce, if the promises of electronic
commerce are to be fulfilled. In this
context, we provide the following Policy Principles for Global Electronic
Commerce. We expect that these
Principles may need to be extended as insights are gained from the development
of the market place.
1.
The development
of electronic commerce should be led primarily by the private sector in response
to market forces.
2. Participation
in electronic commerce should be pursued through an open and fair competitive
market.
3. Government
intervention, when required, should promote a stable, international legal
environment, allow a fair allocation of scarce resources and protect public
interest. Such intervention should be no more than is essential and should be
clear, transparent, objective, non-discriminatory, proportional, flexible, and
technologically neutral.
4. Mechanisms
for private sector input and involvement in policy making should be promoted
and widely used in all countries and international fora.
5. Electronic
commerce is global by nature.
Government policies that affect it should be internationally
co-ordinated and compatible and should facilitate interoperability within an
international, voluntary and consensus-based environment for standards setting.
6. Transactions
conducted using electronic commerce should receive neutral tax treatment in
comparison to transactions using non-electronic means. Taxation of electronic commerce should be
consistent with established, internationally accepted practices, and
administered in the least burdensome manner.
7. Regulation
of the underlying telecommunications infrastructure, when necessary, should enable actors to compete, globally,
in an open and fair market. As competition develops, regulation should be
phased out and there should be a greater reliance on competition law.
8.
The protection of
users, in particular with regard to privacy, confidentiality, anonymity and
content control should be pursued through policies driven by choice, individual
empowerment, industry-led solutions. It will be in accordance with applicable
laws.
9. Business
should make available to consumers and, where appropriate, business users the
means to exercise choice with respect to privacy, confidentiality, content
control and, under appropriate circumstances, anonymity.
10. A
high level of trust in the Global Information Infrastructure-Global Information
Society (GII-GIS) should be pursued by mutual agreement, education, further
technological innovations to enhance security and reliability, adoption of
adequate dispute resolution mechanisms, and private sector
self-regulation.
III. An
action plan
This chapter aims to provide fundamental business views on:
(b) solutions already developed by government
and business
(c) the respective roles of governments and
business, and, within that context –
·
actions business is taking with respect to specific problems; and
·
actions business considers governments should take.
1. Maximising the benefits - economic and
social impacts
Electronic commerce is an innovative approach to ensuring future
sustainable economic growth. Throughout
the world, the profound impact of electronic commerce on the economies and
societies of the globe will undoubtedly improve economic efficiency,
competitiveness and profitability and the development of the information
society. Within such an environment
countries in all stages of development will have the opportunity to benefit by:
·
increasing internal organisational and management efficiency;
·
increasing transaction efficiency and reducing transaction costs for
both suppliers and buyers;
·
extending market reach of suppliers and increasing choice for both
suppliers and consumers;
·
providing accurate information to improve service delivery such as in
health provision or the provision of information to consumers.
Electronic commerce facilitates established business-to-business
commercial relations, sales by companies to consumers, and exchanges between
consumers. It affects the business environment at national, regional and global
levels, and generates major opportunities, and new challenges, for market
growth and development of jobs, industries and services. Consequently,
internationally coordinated efforts are essential in order to secure the
economic benefits of electronic commerce for both the information “rich” and
the information “poor”.
Electronic commerce will have a number of
positive impacts, including:
·
Shrinking the production and distribution chain by reducing
intermediation and changing its nature. In addition, using networks to
integrate markets directly with suppliers and inventory-tracking procedures can
help reduce costs and allow more flexible production methods.
·
The ability to compare prices and other terms globally.
·
Providing virtual shopping facilities that will change concepts of
retailing for a number of goods and services and enhancing the ability of
customers to browse and choose new products and services.
·
Increasing market competition as costs for consumers are reduced and as
market entry barriers for suppliers are lowered, enabling suppliers to address
directly market segments that were previously uneconomical.
·
Raising productivity growth and the development of new activities will
lead to new job creation, but will also result in the demand for new skills.
Measuring electronic commerce as accurately as conventional commerce is
not easy given the difficulty of defining it and adequately capturing the value
associated with it. Nevertheless, for
policy purposes such data are needed to focus the policy debate so that action
is directed towards activities that accurately reflect electronic commerce and
its contributions to economic growth and development.
Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) represent an increasingly
important dimension of the global economy. Particular efforts should be made to
promote SME involvement in electronic commerce to ensure that they can take
maximum advantage of the ability of telecommunications and information
technologies to deliver cost efficiencies, quality control and competitiveness
in manufacturing and service industries. As one of the most dynamic features of
a growing economy, SMEs play a critical role in creating employment and
enhancing GDP. Electronic commerce
provides SMEs with lower market entry costs and the ability to extend geographic
reach to a much larger market.
Electronic commerce is changing the way we do business. We have moved
from an industrial economy where machines dominated productivity, to an
information-based economy where intellectual content is the dominant source of
value added and which knows no geographic boundaries. In this new environment,
education and lifelong learning will be essential not only for workers but for
all in society. As industry, commerce, and services are transformed by
technology, many skills, not only of employees but also of managers and the
self-employed, need to be improved or acquired. Future education will be
supporting formal and non-formal learning arrangements and making it available
to a much wider range of people, including adults returning to learn. The new information technology, such as
interactive media and distance learning, will offer wider access and innovative
approaches to education. As future economic prosperity and social and political
cohesion depend on a well-educated population, lifelong learning will be essential
for everyone as we move into the 21st century.
It is important to recognise the need for global cooperation by both
business and governments to facilitate electronic commerce. Otherwise, there is a risk that a large
segment of the world’s population may not be able to participate in the
economic and social benefits that can arise from electronic commerce. The World Bank for example has recently
estimated that an investment of $300 billion over the next five years will be
required to upgrade the telecommunications infrastructure in developing and
emerging economies. According to the World Bank, 55 percent of this investment
will need to come from private capital, since public sources of funds are
diminishing. Therefore, these countries need to take measures to ensure an
appropriate investment climate.
Countries around the world should use electronic means of
communications to deliver public services and to make public procurement
procedures more efficient. This area requires increased attention to ensure
that these processes and services keep pace with best practices. The benefits are government efficiencies,
equalisation of service provision to all citizens, and the demonstration of
government leadership in the use of electronic commerce technology and
services.
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
2. Small and medium sized
enterprises
|
Business organisations and chambers of commerce will promote
marketing and technology support for SMEs through information brochures,
collection and communication of sector-specific best practice and workshops.
Business will encourage greater interaction between large corporations and
SMEs to provide access to electronic commerce networks for supplier and
contracting opportunities.
|
Government should provide SMEs with
information and education relevant to market entry opportunities provided by
global electronic commerce.
Governments should create an environment that is conducive to private sector investment in information
technologies and encourage capital access for SMEs.
|
|
3. Skills development
|
Business is committed to continue working with government to promote
technical training and life-long learning for all in society.
|
Governments should review existing labour laws to remove existing
barriers for workers to be able to share in the new and different employment
generated by electronic commerce.
Governments should continue to promote both formal and non-formal
skills-development programs.
|
|
4. Ensuring global
participation
|
Existing business organisations will work to expand the participation
from business in developing countries in promoting the uses and benefits of
electronic commerce.
Business will expand its advisory role with international
organisations dealing with electronic commerce issues.
|
Existing international organisations
should increase cooperation, as well as coordination and transparency of
their respective work programmes.
All governments should ensure open and
competitive electronic commerce markets to secure their participation in the
benefits of the information society.
|
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
5. Infrastructure
deployment
|
Business will remain an important driver in the development of the
information infrastructure because it mobilises the private capital needed to
build the global information infrastructure and to develop the technological
innovations that enhance communications.
|
As telecommunications transitions from a monopoly to competitive
environment, a crucial role for the government is that of being a neutral
force in the economy that ensures pro-competitive behaviour, transparent rules,
and value to the user customer.
International organisations should provide a forum for coordinated
government action and international cooperation on matters relating to global
development. Agreements drawn up by multilateral organisations offer the
private sector and governments the necessary legal and regulatory certainty
for investment.
|
|
6. Government as model user
|
Business will work with governments to offer cost-effective
electronic delivery systems for the public sector.
|
Governments are encouraged to use new electronic delivery systems to
provide the means to significantly enhance the internal efficiency and
productivity of public administrations. Governments should be pioneers in
using new technologies for making electronic forms available for collecting
taxes and other functions.
Governments
should promote electronic commerce through its public procurement system,
done in a fully open and competitive environment, based on cost-efficient,
commercial solutions that are technology neutral.
Governments are also encouraged to use new electronic means to
deliver core public services. In particular this would concern public
information and cultural resources, databases for health services, web sites
at local, regional and national levels and public libraries and databases,
where appropriate.
|
2. Electronic
commerce and the information infrastructure – trade aspects, standards and
Internet names and numbers
Competition and trade-related aspects of
electronic commerce
Open competition in the provision of products and services at all
levels of the information society is a prerequisite for the development of
electronic commerce. Regulation of the
underlying telecommunications infrastructure, when necessary, should enable
actors to compete, globally, in an open and fair market. As competition
develops, regulation should be phased out and there should be a greater
reliance on competition. The convergence of telecommunications, IT and
multimedia raises important questions that require international attention for
liberalisation efforts to produce optimum results.
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
1. Telecommunications competition
Telecommunications
competition (continued)
|
Business remains committed to providing practical information about
appropriate competitive safeguards.
Business will continue to call on governments to set and implement
conditions for open and fair competition.
Business is studying means of avoiding and settling commercial
disputes between competitors to provide an alternative to resolution by
regulatory agencies.
|
Effective
implementation of the WTO agreement on basic telecommunications is of
critical importance. In consultation
with business, governments with experience in telecommunications
liberalisation should actively assist signatory countries that still have to
start this process. Countries that
have scheduled commitments under the WTO agreement on basic telecommunications
should review the extent to which their markets are fulfilling the agreement,
publish their findings on a regular basis and work towards the elimination of
MFN exemptions.
The OECD, ITU and WTO - within their respective domains - have a role
to play in facilitating such assistance.
Efforts should be made to increase the number of signatories and
ratifications of the WTO agreement on basic telecommunications. Business
urges WTO members to include as one of the highest negotiating priorities in
any accession protocol market opening commitments in basic telecom services
that at a minimum include: (1) specifying a date certain for full
liberalisation, (2) progressively removing foreign ownership restrictions and
(3) adopting the reference paper in its entirety.
New WTO services negotiations to be launched in Seattle in November
1999 are an opportunity to expand commitments made previously, particularly
by countries either making no commitments or only partial commitments.
Governments
should review favourably the business recommendations on the impact of
telecommunications liberalization on electronic commerce, made to the OECD on
the occasion of the OECD Ottawa Ministerial Conference.
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action
required
|
|
2. IT equipment
|
Business
applauds the WTO Information Technology Agreement (ITA) and urges expansion
of its coverage during the ITA II negotiations. Business urges non-signatories of ITA to join in confirming
their tariff practices to the ITA.
|
The
ITA is of great importance for the development of electronic commerce and
should be widely implemented and expanded.
Governments should make efforts to expand the list of items to which
the ITA applies.
|
|
3. Trade-related aspects of electronic
commerce
|
In response to the WTO's work program to examine all trade-related
issues relating to global electronic commerce, business is responding in a
constructive way by issuing papers on the trade-relate aspects of electronic
commerce.
|
WTO members should recognize that specific WTO
agreements governing trade in goods, trade in services, or trade-related
intellectual property apply to electronic transmissions. WTO members should continue to address the
issue of categorization of electronic transmissions as either goods or
services in their ongoing work programme.
Continued development of electronic commerce requires the ability to
conduct cross-border transactions. In
the WTO services negotiations to be launched in November 1999 in Seattle,
governments should make cross-border commitments across a wide range of
industry sectors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action
required
|
|
4. Convergence
|
Businesses are already
developing, providing and using products and services taking full advantage
of the convergence phenomenon. These
developments are likely to accelerate.
|
Convergence of
technologies is leading to the need for concomitant convergence in regulation
of broadcasting, IT and telecoms.
Convergence is crucial to electronic commerce and must be supported by
appropriate government policies.
Governments should work closely with business in preparing for and
reacting to changes caused by convergence by applying the following
principles:
·
competition policy should be
used as much as possible as the predominant means of preventing abuses of
market power in the telecommunications and media sectors
·
Government regulation should be
limited to promoting fair competition, allocating scarce resources an d
protect the public interest.
Governments
should review favourably the business recommendations on the impact of
telecommunications liberalisation on electronic commerce, made to the OECD on
the occasion of the OECD Ottawa Ministerial Conference.
|
Standards
Electronic commerce offers great economic efficiencies, linking all
parts of a transaction into one integrated end-to-end chain. Government
policies should facilitate interoperability within an international, voluntary
and consensus-based environment for standards setting. The market needs a fully interoperable
architecture, which is being developed within existing standards-setting
institutions or by market forces. In
addition to enforcing appropriate competition laws, governments should ensure
that standards are accepted by customs, taxation and other relevant
governmental agencies. Government
should refrain from developing competing standards through procurement
mechanisms. Where market mechanisms do
not respond to government procurement needs, the private sector and government
should work together to develop a responsive, inter-operative interface.
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
Standards
|
Standards for electronic commerce should continue to be market driven
and industry-led.
Business will continue to work with all relevant international
standards-making bodies to develop international standards that provide added
value and are necessary for the development of electronic commerce.
|
Governments should avoid mandating unnecessary technical standards
that could be and are being led by business.
|
|
|
|
|
Internet names and numbers
Because the Internet is rapidly becoming the vehicle for global
electronic commerce, the management of the domain names system is great
importance.
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
1. Domain name system
|
Business
should have a significant role in the formation of policy for governance of
the domain name system and the development of policy. Through the various Supporting
Organizations of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
(ICANN), and in particular the Business Constituency or the Domain Name
Supporting Organization (DNSO), business will continue to work to ensure
continued stability and security of the Internet, as well as appropriate
protection of intellectual property. The
protection of intellectual property (especially famous names) and efficient
ways of dealing with cybersquatting remain priority issues for business.
|
Governments should
·
continue
to support ICANN
·
support
initiatives to ensure that the business community will have a sufficient
voice in the governance of the domain name system
·
encourage
ICANN to adopt and implement the WIPO recommendations on trademarks and
domain names at the earliest possible time and encourage ICANN not to
duplicate the consultation already conducted through WIPO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The protection of users, in particular with regard to privacy,
confidentiality, anonymity and content control should be pursued through
policies driven by choice, individual empowerment, industry-led solutions, and
will be in accordance with applicable laws.
Business will make available to users the means to exercise choice with
respect to privacy, confidentiality and content control.
Protection of Personal Information
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
1. Privacy and transborder flows of data
|
Business endorses the principles set out in the OECD 1980 Guidelines
for the protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data, and is
committed to implementing fair information practices and transparent
procedures consistent with these Guidelines.
Business uses model contracts and internal control procedures to
satisfy requirements of legislation restricting export of data to third
countries that do not provide a level of protection considered to be adequate
or sufficient by the source country.
The use of model contracts provides a flexible, market-based solution
for meeting differing data protection standards in the conduct of global
business.
|
Governments should adopt a flexible and responsive approach to the
protection of personal information, including the acceptance of
self-regulatory solutions and technological innovations that empower the
user.
Different approaches to the protection of personal information should
not prevent transborder data flows, and governments should cooperate
internationally to ensure a seamless environment. In assessing the level of protection provided to personal information
in other jurisdictions, the criterion should be the objective level of
protection afforded by the system honoured within that jurisdiction.
Model contracts and codes of conduct prepared by the private sector
should be endorsed by relevant governments at the earliest possible time to
promote the free flow of information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
2. Internet privacy
|
Business is committed to work with governments to ensure
non-discrimination among culturally different but adequate regimes for
protection of personal information in the digital environment
Business is developing, based on global marketplace experience, fair
information practices that are consistent with the 1980 OECD Privacy
Guidelines. It does so through self-regulation, voluntary codes and by making
commercially available technologies enabling a high level of privacy
protection tailored to user needs and preferences.
The use of third-party compliance
schemes is growing rapidly in response to market forces. The rate with which such schemes are being
adopted in some jurisdictions demonstrates a strong commitment by the private
sector to embrace consumer satisfaction as a competitive issue. Effective
self-assessment programs have been and continue to be implemented by the
private sector.
Business is reviewing existing self-regulation to ensure that it
takes into account new technologies and provide effective and credible
privacy protection.
|
Governments should recognise that the Internet is a new medium
providing new opportunities and challenges.
Existing regulatory systems must provide consumers with useful
protection of their personal data and at the same time guarantee the free
flow of information needed for the information society to produce the
anticipated benefits. Governments
should also recognize that self-regulation may be a more flexible method of
achieving data protection than government regulation.
To that end, governments should:
·
work with the private sector to
adopt interpretation of existing regulatory solutions based on the
criteria in the paragraph above;
·
recognise the validity and adequacy of effective self-regulation
augmented by the use of privacy-enhancing technologies; and
·
educate the public to use such privacy-enhancing technologies
properly.
Any privacy measures taken by governments should not be more
restrictive than necessary to fulfill the data protection objectives of
Article XIV of the GATS. Current
international initiatives to enhance privacy protection on a global basis
should be taken into consideration when assessing the need for such
measures. The also must not
constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination, or a
disguised restriction on trade in services.
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer trust and content
Within
a freely functioning global electronic marketplace, increasingly sophisticated,
user friendly tools and business practices for empowerment of consumers have
been and continue to be developed and implemented. Those retail Web-sites offering wide ranges of consumer choice
and providing individualisation of the consumer experience are succeeding in
gaining customer support.
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
1. Consumer trust
|
Increasingly
sophisticated empowerment tools for consumers continue to be developed and
implemented to protect and empower consumers in a truly global
marketplace.
Consumer protection is an essential element of building trust in the
online environment and is directly complementary to market principles of
consumer service and satisfaction.
Therefore, there is a business advantage to be gained by companies
that safeguard consumer interests.
|
Consumer protection should develop from appropriate business/consumer
platforms. Business, and interested
parties, should be fully involved in international discussions to set
policies for consumer protection.
Governments have a major role in educating and empowering the public
to enhance awareness of their responsibilities and ability to exercise choice
with respect to their protection as consumers.
The international legal community has only just started reviewing the
many complex legal issues surrounding applicable law and jurisdiction in
cyberspace. Any premature regulation
mandating the law and forum of the country of destination for consumer
transactions would seriously undermine the growth of electronic commerce, as
compliance would be overly burdensome for all business and practically
impossible for small and medium-sized enterprises
The use of out-of-court dispute settlement procedures for consumers
should be encouraged while maintaining court proceedings as the ultimate
solution in case of conflicts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
2. Content
|
Technological
developments have had and will continue to have a profound impact on culture.
However, the emerging digital environment can provide ample distribution
capacity for all content, alleviating "competition" among different
types of content. In addition, the
interactivity of the new technologies enables users to choose more flexibly
among different types of content and governments should not interfere in this
personal decision-making process.
Business continues to
develop and implement voluntary content rating and filtering technologies to
empower consumers.
|
Content regulations are
based on different legal and cultural traditions. Nevertheless, content regulations should be kept to a minimum
as they restrict the free flow of information into the marketplace of ideas. Where content regulations exist, it is the
role of the appropriate law enforcement authority to enforce the law. In the context of potentially
inappropriate, but otherwise legal content, business encourages the use of market-driven
solutions, including the numerous filtering and blocking technologies rather than restricting access to such
content through regulation. Such
technologies empower the consumer to make informed decisions about the type
of content he/she wants and does not want to access.
Governments should enforce
existing laws relating to illegal content.
Any legislation that deals
with the issue of liability should carefully consider the effect such laws
have on the interests of all stakeholders in the electronic environment, and,
where clarifying liability rules for intermediaries, needs to strike a
careful balance between the legitimate business interests of the different
stakeholders involved, including content providers, service providers and
end-users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
3. Marketing and advertising ethics
|
Business
in many countries has a mature system of self-regulatory complaint mechanisms
and cooperative enforceable self-regulation for advertising practices, such
as industry or trade associations, chambers of commerce, better business
bureaux. The concept of business
self-regulation on marketing ethics continues to evolve to adapt to the
online environment through international cooperation and agreement.
Business will continue to improve upon self-regulatory solutions for
Internet advertising and market research. Business is establishing
appropriate international self-regulatory enforcement mechanisms for
violation of such best practice rules
|
In the borderless global environment of the Internet, internationally
incompatible national laws on advertising and promotions seriously impede
cross border sales.
Governments should support self-regulation for Internet advertising
at the global level based on the existing good cooperation between government
agencies and business self-regulatory bodies for traditional advertising at
the national level.
|
|
|
|
|
Issues relating to confidentiality and lawful
access to information
Lawful access issues should be reconsidered urgently in the broader
context of current shifts in the value of information.
|
|
Business
action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
1. Promotion of technology development to
ensure security
|
Business continues to develop technology for ensuring security in
order to build trust in electronic commerce.
|
Governments should support fundamental private sector research and
development relating to security technology.
|
|
2. Cryptography for confidentiality
|
It is crucial for electronic commerce that business and end-users are
able to choose the cryptographic systems that best suit their needs, and that
these systems can function internationally.
Business is opposed to any mandatory system based on a specific
technology. Business will continue to develop and implement cryptographic products
allowing a high level of confidentiality.
Business is prepared to discuss possibilities to protect law
enforcement and national security.
|
The OECD cryptography policy guidelines were an important step in the
direction of a uniform international approach. The urgent need for strong encryption in electronic commerce
necessitates the next step in this co‑operation between business and
government. Governments must enhance
electronic commerce on a free market by removing obstacles to the use of
publicly offered standard encryption solutions.
Governments should commit to:
·
remove all controls on cryptographic technologies and applications;
and
·
cooperate in such a way that interoperability of solutions for
internationally secure exchange of information is facilitated, independent of
their choice of regulation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
3.
Searches and
subpoenas of computer records
|
Business has growing concerns about the use of computer searches by
competition and other law enforcement authorities. There is an urgent need to ensure that law enforcement
practices and policies reflect a clear understanding of how computers work,
how businesses use them, and the extent to which traditional approaches to
the collection of computer records may unnecessarily impose significant costs
on business.
|
When requesting, issuing or executing a search
warrant or a subpoena, government law enforcement agencies should take due
care to cause the least burden to the operations of the subject firm, to
respect privacy and confidentiality requirements, and not to overstep the
territorial scope of the subpoena or search warrant by exploiting computer
linkages with sources in other locations. Law enforcement agencies should not
use the firm's computers to access or seize information stored on computers
outside their jurisdiction but rather rely on existing procedures such as
mutual legal assistance treaties and legislation.
|
|
4. Access to public
domain information
|
To ensure that the information business holds is correct and to
promote efficiency and consumer satisfaction, business needs access to public
domain information to conduct its transactions. International principles, if
appropriate, should be developed in order to guarantee fair use of personal
information prevent liability for the use of public data, and promote the
availability of such data for legitimate commercial purposes.
|
Governments should
guarantee equal and transparent access to public domain information to ensure
business’s legitimate interests, whilst recognising the need to achieve a
balance with the protection of personal information.
|
|
5. Legal government interception of
telecommunications
|
The
development of acceptable international standards is important. Business is concerned about the wide range
of government organisations devising standards that may lead to
inconsistencies.
|
Discussions that may affect existing wiretapping safeguards should
include business participation as a matter of principle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
6. Business monitoring of its own
communications
|
Businesses needs to
monitor their communications to verify and/or prove business transactions and
for quality control or training purposes for the benefit of the customer.
Some regulatory initiatives restrict these legitimate practices.
|
Governments should
guarantee that business can continue to monitor communications for legitimate
purposes (such as the improvement of customer service, the verification or proof
of a business transaction, quality control and training) with the consent of
only one party to the communication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electronic authentication
Electronic signatures, are
important to ensure proper identification of communicating partners, and authenticity
and non-repudiation of messages that they exchange. For this to be realized, a
number of international actions need to be taken. Electronic authentication is an embryonic sector that requires a
flexible framework of rules to evolve. Self-regulation should be given
preference to avoid the lock-in effect of inflexible and potentially
incompatible government regulation.
Many countries are developing, or have already implemented, electronic
signature laws that include rules pertaining to certification services.
Governments have an important role to play in assuring the legal validity of
electronic signatures.
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
1. Legal validity of electronic signatures;
interoperability of certificates and electronic signatures
|
Common
definitions and best practice guidelines for authentication, and in
particular certification practice have been published by several business
organisations and will be continually revised to reflect business practice.
|
Governments should review the proposal that has been made to elevate
certain portions of the UNCITRAL Model Law on electronic commerce to an
international Convention. Governments
should implement the principles on authentication in the OECD Ottawa
Ministerial Declaration.
|
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
Legal validity of
electronic signatures; interoperability of certificates and electronic
signatures (continued)
|
Business supports freedom of contract to establish parties' rights
and responsibilities when using electronic signatures. Contracts enable parties to agree on the
acceptance of electronically signed data and on the terms and conditions of
transactions (including limitations on liability). Contracts can also include the following: methodologies for
enforcing online contracts and resolving disputes; compelling public policy
considerations such as public safety and prevention of fraud issues; and use
of appropriate terms and conditions.
Business looks forward to working with governments within relevant
bodies in this field.
Technical interoperability should be ensured by the private
sector. The legal acceptability of
certificates and electronic signatures, both within a nation and
internationally, should be supported by appropriate government policies.
|
Government
policies should aim to provide a predictable legal framework based on the
fundamental concept of freedom of contract. They should be
non-discriminatory; technologically and architecturally neutral; promote
flexibility as to the content, form and function of certificates and similar
authenticating devices; and promote competition among providers of
authentication services.
Rules
for evaluating the legal validity of electronic signatures should not be
written to require localisation, local partners, local insurance or guarantee
schemes, mutual recognition, or otherwise act as trade barriers. Neutral criteria relating to adequacy
should be used to determine recognition.
Standards for electronic signatures that are used or recognised by
governments should be technology neutral, commercially available, not endorse
or favour any particular solution and should allow for technological
innovation.
|
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
2. Accreditation
|
The marketplace should rely on existing trust infrastructures to
provide the equivalence of accreditation where appropriate. If and when the
accreditation is considered, the marketplace should determine whether an
accreditation or certification of certificate authorities is required. As electronic commerce is an emerging
market, the marketplace may require different kinds or levels of
accreditation or certification.
Accreditation or certification may not be required in every instance.
Those that undertake the accreditation or certification of certificate
authorities should be held liable for their certification actions. Therefore any accreditation solution
should be developed in response to a specific market need and tailored to
address a well-defined requirement.
|
In order to facilitate electronic transactions across borders
governments should by enabling the emergence of borderless networks of
certification authorities supporting voluntary non-discrimination agreements.
Governments should not impose any licensing schemes that could disrupt such
mutual recognition.
|
|
3. Availability of certification practice
statements
|
Business is developing best practices for providing adequate notice
to consumers of the responsibilities of Certifcation Authorities. Business is
developing innovative services and technologies to provide easy access to
notices of these responsibilities.
|
Governments should facilitate the emergence of borderless networks of
certification authorities supporting mutual recognition agreements.
Governments should not impose any licensing schemes that could disrupt such
mutual recognition. If required,
accreditation should be voluntary, based on internationally recognised best
practices.
|
4. Establishing ground rules for the digital
marketplace
Contractual and other legal issues
Freedom of contract must prevail as the underlying principle of all
efforts to create an appropriate legal environment for business-to-business
transactions. Governments can support electronic commerce by enabling
electronic contracting and by facilitating the legal recognition of digitally
authenticated documents and contracts. Governments should avoid prescriptive
and detailed legislation in these areas, but rather develop facilitating
legislation, which may assist the private sector in developing self-regulatory
solutions.
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
1. Removing legal/regulatory obstacles
|
Traditional self-regulatory solutions for international trade are
continually being adapted to new business practice.
The global business community is analysing existing legal and policy
barriers to the digital marketplace, and will make recommendations where
appropriate.
Business is developing technologies and procedures that enable the
creation and determination of electronic "originals".
|
Countries should implement the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic
Commerce, which provides for a particular country to address issues specific
to its jurisdiction, as soon as possible.
There have been calls to elevate portions of the UNCITRAL Model Law to
a Convention.
Some international conventions need to be adapted (UN-ECE has
published an analysis of international work to be done). The good cooperation that exists among
private- and public sector international legal expert bodies should be a
model for future cooperation between business and governments toward
electronic commerce.
|
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
2. Create a new uniform legal framework
|
Through various private-sector trade promotion and facilitation
organisations, a framework of self-regulatory rules for electronic commerce
is evolving. In general, market forces should lead but business acknowledges
that for some key issues there is no self-regulatory substitute for a
reliable legal framework to provide certainty and confidence in electronic
commerce.
|
Governments should continue to work at the international level to
create a coherent legal framework to enable electronic commerce.
|
|
3. Jurisdiction and applicable law
|
Business
will work with governments to find solutions to the problems associated with
determining jurisdiction and applicable law in cyberspace. Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms
and third-party schemes for compliance with self-regulation are being
developed by existing and new types of providers of dispute avoidance and
resolution.
|
Freedom
of contract should be the guiding principle for business-to-business
relationships. The international legal community has only just started
reviewing the many complex legal issues surrounding applicable law and
jurisdiction in cyberspace. Any
premature regulation mandating the law and/or forum of the country of
destination for consumer transactions could inhibit continued growth of
electronic commerce.
Governments
should rely on voluntary business self-regulatory practices and market
pressures to develop more flexible and balanced solutions.
The
use of out-of-court dispute settlement procedures for consumers should be
encouraged while maintaining court proceedings as the ultimate solution in
case of conflicts.
|
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
4. Incorporation by reference
|
In electronic commerce, terms of legal significance will increasingly
be incorporated into contracts by reference. Business will continue to
develop more effective, transparent and user-friendly delivery mechanisms for
the full definitions of such terms.
|
Governments
should continue work on basic international principles for legal validity of
incorporation by reference for all kinds of transactions. These rules should aim to provide
certainty for all parties to electronic commerce transactions.
|
|
5. Transparency and availability of
proprietary and best practice legal terms, model contracts, etc.
|
On-line legal databases with user-friendly reference systems are
being made available for use by parties conducting on-line transactions.
|
Governments are encouraged to promote such business-driven
repositories and to contribute public legal terms and instruments to it.
|
|
6. Dispute settlement
|
Speed and expertise in settling electronic commerce disputes are
important. Providers of alternate
dispute settlement systems are implementing and continue to test tailor-made
voluntary systems appropriate for the settlement of on-line disputes.
|
Governments should encourage the use of self-regulatory dispute
settlement mechanisms as an effective way of resolving electronic commerce
disputes. Courts should urgently develop electronic commerce expertise.
|
|
7. Fraud and other commercial crime
|
Business will continue to advise governments on appropriate action to
combat electronic commerce fraud.
Specialised business organisations will continue to provide
information on fraud and fraudsters to the business community and, where
appropriate and under adequate confidentiality arrangements, to law
enforcement.
Special business organizations are already investigating and will
continue to investigate cybercrime cases.
|
Criminal laws, courts and enforcement agencies should develop more
expertise to deal with electronic commerce fraud and computer crime. When
applying national criminal laws, government should take into consideration
the global nature of electronic commerce.
Close cooperation among governments and between governments and
business is vital in this process.
Electronic authentication techniques are important for users to
protect themselves against fraud. Their legal validity should be addressed as
soon as possible.
|
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
8. Liability
|
Business will review general questions of liability in electronic
commerce and submit its findings to relevant governmental organisations.
|
Freedom
of contract should be the guiding principle. Governments should avoid
creating liability rules that can impede the advancement of electronic
commerce and should work with business to identify areas where liability
rules are required.
|
|
|
|
|
Taxation and tariffs
Tax and tariff policy will be instrumental in determining whether the
vast potential of global electronic commerce can be realized. The development
of electronic commerce is a change in the way in which international business
is conducted and requires a fundamental review of tax policies and laws, which
have their origins in traditional, off-line commerce. Fundamentally, however,
electronic commerce should compete with traditional commerce on a level playing
field. Tax systems should not interfere with the operation of a market economy.
A global perspective is required when addressing this subject, as electronic
commerce cuts across national boundaries to a greater degree than traditional
forms of business. Therefore, consistent taxation approaches at the
international level are absolutely critical to ensure the effectiveness of tax
treatment in the digital economy and the avoidance of double taxation.
Similar income should be treated equally in terms of direct and
indirect tax requirements, regardless whether this is earned through electronic
means or through traditional channels of commerce. Electronic commerce however
should not be the target of new and discriminatory taxes. The application of
existing taxation on electronic commerce should be governed by the principles
of tax neutrality and fairness.
Many taxation issues are not new or unique to electronic commerce but
have already developed in conventional commerce, which increasingly relies on
new modes of communications and increasingly crosses national borders. The mode
of doing business through electronic commerce may add new layers of difficulty
but does not create a new problem. Any legal obligations should not be
restricted to electronic commerce but should apply equally to conventional
commerce as well.
The request for a tariff-free zone for electronic transmissions is
based on a long tradition of reducing or eliminating barriers (such as customs
duties) to international trade. Lowering
trade barriers, including tariffs, is one of the most obvious means of
encouraging international trade as well as global electronic commerce.
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
|
Business is working with governments to ensure that the international
trading system is as free as possible from barriers to trade, including
custom duties.
Commitments
in this area make the business environment stable and predictable and give
business a clearer view of their future trade opportunities. With stability and predictability as part
of the multilateral trading system, trade increases, investment is
encouraged, jobs are created, and consumers can enjoy the benefits of
competition -- choice and lower prices.
|
The WTO's May 1998 Moratorium on Customs Duties on Electronic
Transmissions recognizes that cross-border electronic transmissions are not
now considered importations subject to customs duties or border
controls. There are no customs duties
or border controls on telephone calls across borders; there are no customs
duties or border controls on fax messages; and, there are no customs duties
or border controls on email or computer links.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
2. Taxation
|
Business
strongly supports the use of partnership working groups between business and
government – such as the OECD Technical Advisory Groups - to address the
numerous taxation issues relating to electronic commerce.
Business is working with tax authorities to open this process broadly
to interested business participants. We believe that to ensure the widespread
support of the business community, even greater openness is called for to
ensure timely and valuable input by those in the business community who have
much to offer this process.
We also heartily endorse efforts to seek a truly international
consensus on these taxation issues
|
Governments should work with industry in international fora such as
the OECD Technical Advisory Groups. There should be no new and additional
taxes, such as usage or bit taxes. Future taxation policy on electronic
commerce should:
·
be consistent with the principles of international taxation;
·
be neutral with regard to other forms of commerce;
·
be consistent across tax jurisdictions;
·
avoid double taxation;
·
minimize compliance costs; and
·
be transparent, predictable and with simple rules to follow.
Applying existing taxation principles in the electronic medium must
also be built upon tools that businesses already use or are required to
develop to meet their market needs—it is only in this way that high tax
compliance can be sustained with the least burden, and the fewest economic
distortions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade facilitation and
customs modernisation
For business to use fully the benefits of electronic commerce,
documentation in electronic form should not be denied legal acceptability
solely on the grounds that it in digital form. The handling of customs
documentation, for example, will be both faster and more cost effective if it
can be made in electronic form. The legal acceptability of auditing records and
receipts in electronic form from electronic commerce transactions are other
examples that can substantially reduce costs and facilitate and promote
electronic trade.
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
1. Private/public sector interface
|
Business and governments should work together to ensure compatibility
between standards at appropriate interfaces.
|
Work on customs data requirements is under way in the WCO and the
G7. In other fields, there does not
seem to be an organised effort to harmonise requirements. OECD would be an appropriate forum to
address interface issues relating to taxation.
|
|
2. Customs modernisation
|
Further to the April 1998 Symposium on Trade Facilitation, business
is keen to cooperate with governments within the WCO and WTO on issues
relating to customs modernisation.
Business will continue to work with and advice customs authorities on
issues relating to electronic commerce.
|
To enable businesses and consumers to reap the benefits of electronic
commerce, governments should work through the WCO and WTO to enhance the
efficiency and transparency of customs procedures through the use of
information technologies.
Governments have an important role to play in addressing questions of
trade policy and assuring the legal validity of documents in digital form.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business action / observations
|
Government action required
|
|
3. Capacity building
|
Business
is looking forward to working with governments to offer advice as to how to
coordinate capacity building efforts in developing countries' customs
administrations. Business can do this
by sitting on advisory committees created to formulate capacity building
strategies.
|
Strengthening and streamlining the trade facilitation environment in
all countries will require capacity building in a number of developing
countries; governments should examine existing programs of assistance and
conduct a needs assessment to develop an assistance plan to improve the basic
facilitation environment of all countries.
This can be a collaborative effort with such organizations as the
World Bank, the IMF, the World Customs Organization, and UNCTAD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual property
Adequate protection of intellectual property rights in intangible
assets in cyberspace is a top priority.
|
|
Business
action/
Observations
|
Government action required
|
|
1. Copyright and neighbouring rights
|
Technology is being developed to
better track and protect copyrighted materials, and manage rights. Business is in dialogue with governments
to ensure that copyright (including neighbouring rights) regimes are applied
to the digital environment in a manner that promotes electronic commerce
while protecting intellectual property rights.
Business sectors are committed to
cooperating to prevent, deter and respond to infringements that take place
over digital networks, including the implementation of technical protection
measures; the development of marketplace solutions such as licensing;
cooperation with law enforcement; and refining procedures for promptly
responding to notification or facts and circumstances from which infringing
activity is apparent.
Business will continue to provide
information on the intellectual property implications of new technology.
|
WIPO
adopted the Copyright and the Performances and Phonograms Treaties in
December 1996. Governments should now
move promptly to ratify and implement these treaties, taking into account the
challenges and opportunities of the digital environment. The goal must be the
establishment of a balanced and realistic framework of accountability that
respects international norms; provides incentives for increased
inter-industry cooperation to deter and respond to infringements; promotes
responsible business practices; does not impose unreasonable burdens on
intermediaries; and preserves an appropriate role for courts. Any legislation
that deals with the applicability of copyright infringement liability rules
should carefully examine how these rules apply to all stakeholders in the
digital networked environment. Any
framework that provides for limitations on liability for service providers
should be restricted to damages and other monetary relief. Injunctive relief and other forms of
equitable relief should be available subject to applicable laws governing
such relief.
Governments should consider further
measures to secure property rights in the digital networked environment,
including filling the gaps in protection for producers and performers of
sound recordings left by the Performances and Phonograms Treaty.
|
|
|
Business
action/ observations
|
Government action required
|
|
2. Trademarks
|
Business has highlighted the problems raised by the discrepancy
between the national scope of trademark laws and the international nature of
electronic commerce and will work with WIPO to examine possible solutions.
(See also Domain name system under Internet governance above).
|
Governments should work together at the international level in WIPO
to ensure that national differences in trademark law and policy do not impede
the trademark owner’s ability to exploit and protect their trademarks in
cyberspace.
|
|
3. Databases
|
Business is contributing to WIPO’s work on this issue.
|
Governments should continue to work, through WIPO, towards adequate
protection of intellectual property in databases.
|
IV Annex - Selected industry self-regulatory
initiatives
This annex provides examples of
cross-company and joint business/government initiatives aiming to enhance trust
in electronic commerce. Innovative
schemes operated by individual companies are not included – although very often
such proprietary efforts play a crucial role in heightening, through
competition, standards of good business practice, this action plan is not the
appropriate place to provide information on private initiatives. Finally, the annex is not meant to be an
exhaustive list of initiatives but rather an attempt to demonstrate the rich
variety of projects that the private sector is initiating to remove barriers to
electronic commerce.
|
BBBOnLine
Reliability Program and BBBOnline Privacy Program
Bolero 4
Business
Code of Conduct from the Swedish IT Companies Organization
Canadian
Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) Code Of Conduct
Canadian
Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) Privacy Code
Canadian
Association of Internet Providers CAIP ISP Fair Practices
Canadian
Standards Association Model Core for the Protection of Personal Information
CAP
Trustmark Scheme for UK Internet Advertising
Casetrust
CBI
Contractual Clauses and Group Policies
Certification
Authentication Guidelines
Clicksure
Code
of Conduct for Electronic Commerce
Code
of Conduct on Privacy
CPA
Web Trust
Cross
Certification Guidelines (alpha version)
Cybercrime
Unit of ICC Commercial Crime Services
Cybernotary
project
Cybertribunal
Digital
Signatures for XML
Dispute
resolution for E-commerce and Y2K
EASA
cross-border complaint system
Electronic
Notary System Guidelines
Electronic
Originals Initiative
European
Electronic Signature Standardisation Initiative (EESSI)
ESOMAR
Internet Guidelines
GUIDEC
Guidelines
for Codes of Practice for Internet Service Providers
Guidelines
for Electronic Direct Marketing
Guidelines
for Protecting Personal Information in
Cyber Business
|
43
44
44
45
45
46
47
48
48
49
50
50
51
52
53
54
55
55
56
57
57
58
59
60
60
61
62
62
63
63
64
|
|
Guidelines
for Transactions between Virtual Merchants and Consumers
Guidelines
for Use of Smart Cards
Guidelines
on Personal Information Protection in Electronic Commerce in the Private
Sector
High
Assurance General ID Certification with Private Key Protected in an
Electronic ID Card
Hotlines
against illegal content
ICC
E-terms repository
ICC
Internet Advertising Guidelines
Internet
Content Rating Association
International
DOI Foundation
Internet
One
Memorandum
of Understanding on Open Access to Electronic Commerce for European SMEs
Model
Contract Clauses for Transborder Data Flows
Model
Electronic Sales Contract
New
Zealand Internet Marketing Standards Authority (IMSA)
Online
Mark System for Winning Trust for Electronic Commerce
Online
Ombuds Office
Online
Privacy Alliance (OPA)
PKI
Assessment Guidelines
Platform
for Privacy Preferences (P3P)
Security
Guidelines for Smart Card Electronic Money Systems
Self-regulation
for e-commerce marketing
Standard
for Internet Commerce
SILEC
Testbedding
and Evaluation Model for Shopping Mall Construction Technologies
TradeCard
Trust-e
TTP.NL
URETS
World Chambers Network
|
64
65
65
66
66
67
67
68
69
70
71
72
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
78
79
79
80
81
81
82
83
83
84
|
|
Name of Initiative
|
BBBOnLine Reliability
Program and BBBOnline Privacy Program
|
|
Objective
|
BBBOnLine was established to help build consumer trust and confidence
in online commerce. The Reliability
programs helps assure that a company’s advertising is truthful &
accurate, the company commits to delivering the products & services
offered and that, if the company cannot resolve a dispute with a consumer, it
commits to using a third party arbitration/mediation program such as the
Better Business Bureau. BBBOnLine
Privacy offers a comprehensive assessment process to measure a company’s
ability to stand behind the promises made in its online privacy policy and
offers a dispute resolution process for consumer privacy concerns.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
In both the reliability and Privacy programs a company signs a
license agreement committing to the principles of the program and the
particular resolution process applicable to the program.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
BBBOnLine is part of the Council of Better Business Bureaus
representing 320 major corporations and 132 local Better Business Bureaus.
The local bureaus have over
270 000 business as part of their membership base.
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
BBBOnLine Reliability was launched on 30 April 1997
BBBOnLine Privacy was launched on 17
March 1999
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Both programs are applicable to all businesses that are able to meet
the standards and other criteria of the program.
|
|
Sector
|
BBBOnLine Reliability is applicable to companies located in the
United States and Canada. BBBOnLine Privacy is applicable to a company
located anywhere if it markets to citizens of the United States or Canada.
BBBOnLine is working with organizations in different countries to build
co-operative partnerships to address privacy and consumer protection issues.
|
|
Geographic
|
|
|
Examples of application
|
The BBBOnLine Reliability Program currently has 3,500 companies
participating and new companies are being added at a rate of between 50 and
70 a week. As of this date all
disputes have been resolved without a formal arbitration needed. The BBBOnLine Privacy Program has 60
companies approved and about 400 companies in one stage or another of the
process.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
BBBOnLine works closely with the US Federal Trade Commission, State
Attorney Generals and local law enforcement organisations if a fraudulent or
scam type web site is identified. In
developing the new Privacy program BBBOnLine worked closely with the
Department of Commerce and Federal Trade Commission. The Council of Better Business Bureaus has
a long successful history working closely with appropriate government
organisations.
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Mr Russell Bodoff
Senior Vice President & COO
BBBOnLine Inc.
42 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, VA 22202
Tel 703 247 9331
Fax 709 276 8112
e-mail: rbodoff@cbbb.bbb.org
URL: www.bbbonline.org
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Goal is to partner with other organisations to develop a global
approach to building consumer trust and confidence n online commerce.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Bolero System
|
|
Objective
|
Facilitating international trade through a technical and legal
infrastructure for electronic commerce
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Contract-based interfacing with domestic laws
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Bolero International Limited
Bolero Association Limited
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Bolero-enabled partners listed at www.bolero.net
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
September 1999
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
International trade
|
|
Sector
|
Initial focus on shipping
|
|
Geographic
|
Worldwide
|
|
Examples of application
|
Case studies appear at www.bolero.net. Users have realised substantial cost savings.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Customs and other regulatory offices participate actively.
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
www.bolero.net
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Broadening focus to include an increasing number of trade
transactions and instruments with both technical and legal support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Business code of conduct
from the Swedish IT-companies’ Organisation
|
|
Objective
|
The Swedish IT-companies’ Organisation has issued seven business
rules for their members. One of the rules regulates the following aspects of
electronic information:
·
Distribution of inappropriate or abusive information
·
Respect of privacy and integrity
·
Electronic marketing and spamming
·
Transparency in pricing and other conditions
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Binding on members
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Swedish IT-companies’ Organisation
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Federation of Swedish Industries
|
|
Date of issuance / implementation
|
1997
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-business and
business-to-consumer
|
|
Sector
|
--
|
|
Geographic
|
--
|
|
Examples of application
|
600 member companies
|
|
Participation public sector
|
--
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
www.sito.se
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Initiative
|
The Canadian Association of
Internet Providers (CAIP) Code Of Conduct
|
|
Objective
|
To govern the business conduct of ISPs as it relates to the public,
public bodies and law enforcement officials.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary adherence.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Industry Canada
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
October 1996
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
To assist ISPs with the development and implementation of internal
policies and practices to comply with existing legal standards.
|
|
Sector
|
Internet Service Providers
|
|
Geographic
|
Canada
|
|
Examples of application
|
The Code will guide ISPs when the receive complaints about illegal
content on web sites or network abuse.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Industry Canada
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
www.caip.ca/caipcode.html
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
CAIP is currently developing a “Fair Practices” guide for its ISP
members that will, among other things, provide them with further direction
regarding practical means and tools to comply with the Code of Conduct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Initiative
|
The Canadian Association of
Internet Providers (CAIP) Privacy Code
|
|
Objective
|
To apply the principles of the Canadian Standards Association Model
Code for the Protection of Personal Information to the online environment.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
The Canadian Association of Internet Providers
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Industry Canada
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
September 1998
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
The CAIP Privacy Code is a voluntary code that represents a formal
statement of principles and guidelines concerning the minimum protection that
CAIP members will provide to their users regarding the protection of personal
information. The Code applies to the management of personal information about
a CAIP member’s users in any form whether oral, electronic or written that is
collected, used or disclosed by a member.
|
|
Sector
|
Internet Service Providers
|
|
Geographic
|
Canada
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Ministry of Consumer and Commercial Relations (ON)
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
www.caip.ca/privacy.html
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
CAIP is currently developing a “Fair Practices” guide for its ISP
members that will, among other things, provide them with further direction
regarding practical means and tools to comply with the CAIP Privacy Code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Initiative
|
The Canadian Association of
Internet Providers CAIP ISP Fair Practices
|
|
Objective
|
To provide CAIP members with practical means to comply with CAIP’s
Code of Conduct and Privacy Code, and thereby promote consumer confidence in
the use of the Internet.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP).
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Industry Canada
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Fall 1999
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
To create modular action plans to help ISPs address issues relating
to reputable delivery of service, content, privacy, security and unsolicited
commercial email (spam).
|
|
Sector
|
Internet Service Providers (ISPs)
|
|
Geographic
|
Canada
|
|
Examples of application
|
The document will provide guidance to ISPs respecting procedures to
follow when they receive complaints about illegal or objectionable content
and the formation of contracts to be used with subscribers and web site
owners.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Industry Canada
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
www.caip.ca
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Initiative
|
Canadian Standards
Association Model Code for the Protection of Personal Information
|
|
Objective
|
Addresses two broad concerns: the way in which organisations collect,
use and disclose personal information; and the right of individuals to have
access to personal information about themselves and to have the information
corrected if necessary.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary, but referenced by law or regulatory bodies in a variety of
situations in Canada.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Canadian Standards Association (CSA)
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Price Waterhouse - chair
ITAC
CBA
Stentor
American Express
Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Digital
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
March 1996
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Consumer -to-Business
|
|
Sector
|
Transportation, Telecommunications, IT, Insurance, Health and Banking
|
|
Geographic
|
Canada
|
|
Examples of application
|
Industry Canada - Jan 1998 - The
Protection of Personal Information suggests using the CSA Model as a
framework for Canadian legislation on privacy.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Ministry of Consumer and Commercial Relations (ON)
Industry Canada
Office of Privacy Commissioner
Department of Justice
Heritage Canada
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
CSA
178 Rexdale Blvd.
Etobicoke, Ontario M9W 1R3
Tel: (416) 747-4044
Ellen Pekiles
pekilise@csa.ca
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Initiative
|
CAP Trustmark Scheme for UK
Internet Advertising
|
|
Objective
|
A self-regulatory scheme for UK Internet advertising so that
advertisers can declare to consumers their intention to advertise in a legal,
decent, honest and truthful way.
Those joining the scheme agree to comply with the British Codes of
Advertising and Sales Promotion and the rulings of the Advertising Standards
Authority. Main aims are to:
-
give consumers trust and confidence in Internet advertising,
especially advertising in the Trustmark scheme, and
-
inspire the confidence of governments, opinion formers and consumers
in self-regulation for Internet advertising to ensure that new legislation on
advertising is kept to a minimum.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary agreements between advertisers, agencies and the media to
comply with the British Codes of Advertising and Sales Promotion and rulings
of the Advertising Standards Authority, backed up by legislation applied by
the Office of Fair Trading (a government department) through the Control of
Misleading Advertisements Regulations 1988.
Adjudications on complaints under the Codes are published in the ASA’s
Monthly Report, which is published on the ASA’s website and circulated in a
printed version to journalists, government departments, the advertising
industry, opinion formers and is available free of charge on request. The use of the CAP trustmark scheme does
not indicate “approval” by either the ASA or CAP of the advertising material
on the Internet. ASA will consider complaints against UK advertisers who are
not in the scheme as well as against those who are in the scheme.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
The Committee of Advertising Practice through its Trustmark Standing
Group
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
The Advertising Standards Authority
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Spring 1999 (subject to consultation)
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
The British Codes of Advertising and Sales Promotion cover
consumer-to-business and business-to-business non-broadcast advertising. The Trustmark scheme is principally aimed
at giving consumers confidence in business-to-consumer advertising.
|
|
Sector
|
The Trustmark scheme and the Codes apply to UK Internet advertising
and the use of the scheme will enable companies to declare to consumers that
the UK is their county of origin and that they will cooperate with the ASA
and CAP in resolving complaints.
|
|
Geographic
|
The UK Codes also cover the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands.
|
|
Examples of application
|
In 1998, ASA resolved 34 complaints about on-line ads, 6 required
formal investigation and all of them were found to break the Codes, a further
8 presented smaller or clear-cut problems and were informally resolved.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Consultation on the Trustmark scheme will include discussions with
the relevant UK Government departments, in particular the Department of trade
& Industry and the Office of Fair Trading, and also local government agencies,
consumer organisations. At this stage
consultation is with the trade bodies in CAP, the Internet advertising
industry and related trade bodies.
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Caroline Crawford, Director of
Communications, ASA/CAP
2 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HW
tel: 44-171-580 5555
Fax: 44-171-637 5979
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
ASA is one of the 22 countries in the European Advertising Standards
Alliance (see further in this annex). The scheme will also be recommended to
the ICC for consideration in their discussion on the arbitration of
complaints under its Internet Advertising Guidelines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Initiative
|
Casetrust
|
|
Objective
|
Allowing
a balance to be struck between the concerns of consumers and the constrains
faced by retailers.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Casetrust aims to address the assurance issue
in e-commerce by making it compulsory for all cybershops to have in place
proper security systems in order to join the scheme. Participating online retailers are also
required to adopt a set of business practices such as respecting the privacy
of customers’ personal information.
Consumers can verify that the website is a genuine Casetrust retailer
by referring to the online directory developed by CNSG. The Casetrust qualifying criteria set out
the minimum standards that retailers must comply with. Retailers who qualify for the scheme will
be awarded the Casetrust logo, which may then be displayed prominently on their
websites or shopfronts. Checks will
be conducted at random to ensure that the retailers practice what they
preach. In addition, all retailers
will be subjected to annual assessment to ensure that standards are
maintained. Casetrust offers redress
to consumers who may be dissatisfied with their purchases. If the matter is not resolved amicably
within a reasonable period of time, it will then be brought up to the
Casetrust mediation panel for resolution.
The emphasis on dispute resolution and avoidance, will also lay the
ground for a Fair Trading legislation.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE)
Retail Promotion Centre (RPC)
CommerceNet Singapore Ltd (CNSG)
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
National Computer Board
Singapore Broadcasting Authority
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
End 1999
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
|
|
Sector
|
On-line & physical shopfronts
|
|
Geographic
|
Singapore
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
NIL
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Retail Promotion Centre
Blk 528 Ang Mo Kio Avenue 10 #02-2387
Singapore 560528
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Internationalisation of the cyber element
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
CBI Contractual Clauses and
Group Policies
|
|
Objective
|
To enable data transfers to countries outside the EEA
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Via obligations and warranties
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
CBI
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Still seeking approval from the UK’s Data Protection Registrar and
the Commission
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
|
|
Sector
|
All sectors
|
|
Geographic
|
All countries
|
|
Examples of application
|
Can be used to ensure adequate protection for employee data being
transferred from a subsidiary company in the EEA to a parent company outside
the EEA.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Jackie Walster, CBI Company & Commercial Law Group- 0171 395 8045
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Hope to finalise by end ‘99
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Certification Authority
Guidelines
|
|
Objective
|
These guidelines are intended for operators of certification
authorities, and put a special focus on certification authorities in large,
open systems that issue certificates available for electronic transactions
and payment, electronic data exchange, electronic mail, etc. conducted among
many unspecified people.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Electronic Commerce Promotion Council of Japan (ECOM)
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
March, 1998
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer
|
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific
|
|
|
Geographic
|
Japan/International
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.ecom.or.jp/ecom_e
info@ecom.or.jp
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Will be updated regularly as needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Initiative
|
|
|
Objective
|
Clicksure provides
accredited third party certification of e-commerce operations which meet a
quality standard overseen by an independent Advisory Council.
The clicksure
quality standard covers everything that a quality e-commerce operation should
be thinking about to achieve a best practice e-commerce solution.
Clicksure certified operations
demonstrate their commitment to, and achievement of e-commerce quality by
displaying the clicksure Quality
Seal on their web sites, on promotional literature and stationery.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Independent third party assessment of all certified operations; and
continuous surveillance of the Quality Seal
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
The clicksure
program complies with ISO Guide 62 – the International Organization for
Standardization guide for global voluntary certification bodies. Clicksure is has applied for accreditation to EN45012 by
the Dutch National Competent Authority (RvA). EN45012 is the European standard for certification bodies
providing quality assurance verification.
EN45012 Accreditation requires clicksure to maintain up to date quality and procedures
manuals; and adequate training and skills for all personnel – especially
assessors. Clicksure is regularly
auditied by RvA to ensure that our quality practices are implemented and that
all our decisions are impartial.
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Clicksure has a signatories program.
Current members are listed on the program web site.
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
The clicksure program was launched on 23rd June 1999.
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Quality assurance, including both performance and process criteria
|
|
Sector
|
All sectors
|
|
Geographic
|
Worldwide
|
|
Examples of application
|
Expect to have over 400 participating e-commerce operations by the
end of 1999.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
The clicksure program is open to all stakeholder groups ; and
clicksure is keen to involve public sector bodies in its development. Ongoing activities include close
collaboration with a number of national governments.
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Clicksure Limited
Oxford Centre for Innovation
Mill Street
Oxford OX2 0JX
Tel : +44 (0)1865 242309
Email : info@clicksure.com
url : www.clicksure.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Code of Conduct for
Electronic Commerce
|
|
Objective
|
To draft a framework with a minimum set of rules for model behaviour,
which might gain commitment of all parties involved in electronic commerce
and thus attribute to the process of building trust and confidence. The
general principles Transparency, Reliability and Confidentiality and privacy
have been taken as a starting point.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Contractually binding for subscribers, possibly agreements on
private-law settlement of disputes. Certification will possibly be another
way of enforcement.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
The Dutch Electronic Commerce Platform (ECP.NL).
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
the Confederation of Netherlands Industry and Employers (VNO-NCW),
individual companies, the Dutch consumer organisation Consumentenbond, as
well as the Economic Affairs Department and the Justice Department.
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Draft 2.0 was released in July 1999
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-business; Business-to-consumer
|
|
|
Sector
|
All sectors
|
|
|
Geographic
|
No limits
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
See "Supporting organisations"
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Arie-van.bellen@ecp.nl (Mr. Arie van Bellen)
Nicolette.docter@ecp.nl (Ms. Nicolette Docter)
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
The code may serve as a basis for sector specific codes of Conduct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Code of conduct on privacy
|
|
Objective
|
To translate the EU privacy directive, especially those principles
that can be found in the OECD Privacy Guidelines, into practical and balanced
guidelines for the legitimate processing of personal data and to ensure an
adequate level of protection in the private sector. Leading principles are
market demand and consumer empowerment.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Easy accessible complaint procedures and alternative dispute
resolutions. Depending on the way the sector is organized: contractually
binding or via members/subscribers. Certification will most probably be
another way of enforcement.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Joint inititative of the Dutch consumers association, the
Consumentenbond and the Confederation of Netherlands Industry and Employers
VNO-NCW
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
The Dutch private sector
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Adopted by Dutch industries in December 1998.
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-business; Business-to-consumer
|
|
|
Sector
|
All sectors
|
|
|
Geographic
|
No limits, also no clause on jurisdiction
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
shkatus@vno-ncw.nl (Sergej Katus)
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
If desired by the market, the code may serve as a basis for sector
specific privacy codes. A code of
conduct for the working environment is considered as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Initiative
|
CPA WebTrust
|
|
Objective
|
1)
To build trust and confidence in eCommerce by increasing consumer
confidence in using the Internet
2)
Helping businesses deliver on their sales promises
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
WebTrust involves a full-scope audit of a website by an independent,
specially trained CPA, or their equivalents around the world, using the
WebTrust Principles and Criteria as a benchmark to determine the soundness of
on-line businesses’ activities. Due
to the nature of an audit, WebTrust is an effective eCommerce fraud deterrent
and a comprehensive eCommerce seal of assurance. All WebTrust audits are performed on site and involve a
critical review of online businesses internal control policies and procedures
related to eCommerce.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Canadian
Institute of Chartered Accountants
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
VeriSign, Inc. is a strategic partner of CPA WebTrust and offers
state of the art encryption technology to prevent the WebTrust seal from
being copied on the Web.
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Version 1.0 issued September 1997; Version 1.1 issued April 1999;
Version 2.0 issued August 1999
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
CPA WebTrust entails an independent CPA performing an audit of a
website’s (1) business practices and privacy (tests to perform that an online
business properly discloses business and privacy disclosures and can demonstrate
compliance with those policies over a given time period); (2) transaction
integrity (tests to determine that an on-line business can demonstrate a
proven history of delivery goods and services at prices it agreed to with
online consumers) and (3) information privacy (tests to determine that
appropriate security measures are in place (such as firewalls, SSL
technology) both during transmission of data online and also once information
reaches an on-line business.
|
|
Sector
|
WebTrust is available to all sectors (public and private)
|
|
Geographic
|
WebTrust is currently offered in the United States, Canada, the
United Kingdom and Ireland, France, Australia and New Zealand. Plans are underway for future expansion
into other European countries and Asia. Certain accounting firms have been granted worldwide licenses to
offer WebTrust in any country where they have offices. WebTrust is scalable
upwards to meet more rigorous laws or regulations in certain countries. No exceptions or exclusions are ever made
to the fundamental WebTrust Principles and Criteria.
|
|
Examples of application
|
WebTrust is currently designed for use in a business to consumer
application. The AICPA has recently
added WebTrust for Internet Service Providers into the WebTrust family of services. Also expected in the near future are
WebTrust for Certificate Authorities and WebTrust for Business to Business
applications.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
None
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Anthony Pugliese, Director of Assurance Services (212) 596-6083, apugliese@aicpa.org
Sheryl Weiner, WebTrust Team Leader, (201) 938-3751, sweiner@aicpa.org
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
The AICPA anticipates WebTrust will evolve into the recognized seal
of choice by consumers and businesses alike due to the fundamental nature of
the program itself. It represents an
independent examination by a qualified CPA or their equivalents around the world. WebTrust is an effective self- regulatory
model for government due to its inherent fraud detection capabilities and its
comprehensive nature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Cross Certification
Guidelines (alpha version)
|
|
Objective
|
An end entity will need to possess multiple certificates, including
certificates used across multiple applications, as well as certificates used
on a per service or application basis.
This document is provided for end entities using multiple application
certificates to enjoy various types of services through the use “cross
certificates” issued by the same or another certification domain.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Electronic Commerce Promotion Council of Japan (ECOM)
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
March, 1998
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer
|
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific
|
|
|
Geographic
|
International
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.ecom.or.jp/ecom_e
info@ecom.or.jp
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Will be updated regularly as needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Cybercrime
Unit of ICC Commercial Crime Services
|
|
Objective
|
To investigate, collate &
disseminate information to the industry on all matters relating to commercial
cybercrime
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
None
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Implementing organization(s)
|
ICC Commercial Crime Services
|
|
Supporting organization(s)
|
|
|
(Expected) Date of
issuance/implementation
|
01/01/2000
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Commercial Crime & Malpractice
Internet & Corporate Networks
|
|
Sector
|
Non-sector specific
|
|
Geographic
|
Worldwide
|
|
Examples of application
|
Not yet available
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Yes, works closely with Government
Agencies and Law Enforcement.
|
|
For full text/further information
Consult/contact
|
P Mukundan, Director, ICC-Commercial
Crime Services
Ccs@dial.pipex.com
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the
Initiative
|
To become a focal point for business in
respect of information regarding
Commercial cybercrime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Cybernotary project
|
|
Objective
|
Establishment of profession to enable electronic certification and
authentication of documents
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
General law requiring the intervention of the Notary
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
CyberNotary Association UK
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
UK Notarial Forum comprising Society of Scrivener Notaries, Notaries'
Society and Law Society of Scotland
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Early 2000
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
World-wide application
|
|
Sector
|
Legal
|
|
Geographic
|
UK based
|
|
Examples of application
|
All forms of legal documentation, transfers of real estate,
commercial contracts
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Some backing from EU DG XIII
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
CyberNotary Association UK, 26 Drumsheugh Gardens
Edinburgh EH3 7YR
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Mirrors similar scheme in the USA
|
|
|
|
|
Name of
initiative
|
Cybertribunal
|
|
Objective
|
The
establishment of an innovative service for the prevention and resolution of
conflicts arising in cyberspace by recourse to electronic mediation and
arbitration.
|
|
Enforcement
mechanism(s)
|
The market. Cyber-sellers (including any physical or
legal person offering products, services or licenses on the Internet) are
invited to obtain the CyberTribunal seal and post it on their Websites,
thereby committing to submitting any conflict with clients to the mediation
process and, if necessary, the CyberTribunal arbitration procedure.
|
|
Leader(s)
initiative
|
Issuing/
Implementing
organisation(s)
|
The
CyberTribunal is for now hosted at the University of Montreal, Quebec,
Canada.
|
|
|
Supporting
organisation(s)
|
Ombuds-Online,
an online mediation initiative, of the University of Massachussetts, USA.
|
|
[expected] Date
of issuance /implementation
|
June4th, 1998
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Areas of action
are: electronic commerce, competition, copyright, trademark, privacy, freedom
of expression and all other type of cases with the exception of cases under
criminal law or involving public order (ordre public). Services of arbitration and mediation are
offered in English and French, and soon, in Spanish. The CyberTribunal will
deal only with conflicts arising in cyberspace, not with conflicts arising in
the physical world.
|
|
|
Sector
|
Non
sector-specific
|
|
|
Geographic
|
No geographic
boundaries: the Internet
|
|
Examples of
application
|
The
CyberTribunal has dealt, since its launch, with cases involving mainly
consumers and cyber-sellers (e-commerce disputes) and with copyright issues
(disputes between two individuals concerning the ownership of some electronic
materials accessible through a website).
|
|
Participation
public sector
|
Sponsored, in
part, by the Quebec Government and the Government of Canada
|
|
For full
text/further information consult/contact
|
Prof. Karim
benyekhlef at <karim.benyekhlef@umontreal.ca>
URL:
<www.cybertribunal.org>
|
|
Possible/expected
evolution of the initiative
|
Setting up
partnerships with similar foreign endeavours to provide mediation and
arbitration services worldwide on the Internet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Initiative
|
Digital Signatures for XML
|
|
Objective
|
Build privacy protection and personal information management tools
into the infrastructure of the World Wide Web
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
P3P is a voluntary technical specification
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
World Wide Web Consortium
Internet Engineering Task Force
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
1Q2000
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Digital Signatures/Authentication
|
|
Sector
|
|
|
Geographic
|
Global
|
|
Examples of application
|
Ability to digitally-sign any document on the Web will enable
applications such as electonic checks, web-based contracting, secure access
to web pages, and trusted privacy policies through W3C’s Platform for Privacy
Preferences (P3P).
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Daniel J. Weitzner, Technology and Society Domain Leader, djweitzner@w3.org -
http://www.w3.org/Signature/
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Dispute resolution for
electronic commerce & Y2K
|
|
Objective
|
ICC offers a variety of
high-speed, low-cost methods for resolving Y2K and electronic commerce
disputes through arbitration under the 1998 ICC Rules of Arbitration;
Fast-track arbitration under the 1998 rules; Centre for Expertise for use
prior to any formal dispute resolution mechanism; ICC Rules for Optional
Conciliation, which is a form of voluntary and non-binding mediation.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
After voluntary incorporation into a contract an arbitration clause
becomes binding upon the parties.
Pursuant to various treaties (i.e. the New York Convention), arbitral
awards are enforceable in signatory states.
Alternate dispute resolution mechanisms may be appropriate vehicles
for the enforcement of self-regulatory guidelines, codes and practices.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
ICC (International Chamber of Commerce)
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Specific rules under development; new generic arbitration rules in
effect since 1 January 1998.
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Mostly business-to-business, but consumer-to-business disputes are
not excluded.
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific.
|
|
Geographic
|
International
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
None
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.iccwbo.org
Fabien Gelinas, +33-1-9532943
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
ICC dispute resolution mechanisms will continue to evolve to meet
business needs in electronic commerce and generally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Initiative
|
European Advertising
Standards Alliance (EASA): Cross-Border Complaints System
|
|
Objective
|
The key objectives of the EASA’s development of self-regulation for
the Internet are:
a)
To provide effective channels for the resolution of cross border
complaints about advertisements;
b)
To develop high Internet standards through best advertising practice
to give consumers confidence and trust in the advertisements they access;
c)
To give national, European and International Governments, consumer
bodies and opinion formers confidence in the advertising industry’s
self-regulatory systems to keep the need for legislation to a minimum.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
National self-regulatory systems
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
EASA Internet Working Group/ National Self-regulatory Organisations
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
EASA Members – Self-regulatory Organisations
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
(July 1999 – issued to advertising industry bodies for
consultation/feedback) Issuance expected in 2000
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
National self-regulatory codes/principles. The existing national
self-regulatory systems for advertising in the EASA member countries
|
|
Sector
|
|
|
Geographic
|
The EASA has 27 members from 24 countries, and comprises of 22
European countries, including all European Union (EU) Member States, as well
as two corresponding members in South Africa and New Zealand. The national codes/principles are based on
those drawn up by ICC.
|
|
Examples of application
|
The EASA established a cross border complaint procedure in 1992, and
this has now been extended to co-ordinate consumer complaints about the
content of electronic advertisements. The procedure is based on the country
of origin principle, as prescribed in the EU Television Without Frontiers
(Broadcasting) Directive (97/36/EC) and applies to complaints from one member
country about advertisements that originate in another. These procedures are
applicable for Internet advertising as self-regulation, backed up where
appropriate by nationally based legislation, is seen to be the most
appropriate and effective measure to provide protection for consumers while
enabling commerce to flourish. To date the cross-border complaints system has
closed a number of Internet complaints.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
National organisations and EU
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Phil Murphy
Project Co-ordinator
European Advertising Standards Alliance
10A Rue de la Pépinière
B - 1000 Brussels
Belgium
Tel.: (+32 2) 513 78 06
Fax: (+32 2) 513 28 61
E-mail: library@easa-alliance.org
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
This will contribute to a wider evaluation of internet advertising
and cross-border complaints handling with the advertising industry, and to
the stimulation of discussions that will aid our understanding and further
develop the self-regulation of Internet advertising on a global level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Electronic Notary System
Guidelines
|
|
Objective
|
These guidelines concern those who participate in electronic
commerce, MIS departments in companies, and electronic notary service
providers. It establishes guidelines for safe, secure electronic commerce.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Electronic Commerce Promotion Council of Japan (ECOM)
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
March, 1998
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer
|
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific
|
|
|
Geographic
|
Japan (nation wide)
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.ecom.or.jp/ecom_e
info@ecom.or.jp
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Electronic Original
Initiative
|
|
Objective
|
To provide by Codes of Good Practice a “Standard” for the acceptance
at court and for archival purposes of electronic documents and e-commerce
transactions.
5 Codes cover technical and operational requirements for:
1.
Information Stored Electronically
2.
Electronic Communications and e-mail Policy
3.
Identity, Signature and Copyright
4.
Using Certification Authorities
5.
Using Trusted Third Party Archives
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary: audits can be by self audit or use of outside consultants.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Set up by Group 5 Group as not for profit organisation
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Supported by Advisory Board
Publishers / Branders 10/15
Reviewers 35
Legal change, Europe, USA and Oceania
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
First five publishers 20/9/99 10 to follow
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Generic not technology specific
|
|
Sector
|
All
|
|
Geographic
|
Worldwide
|
|
Examples of application
|
Provides essential bases for development of e-business and
e-commerce. Initial Code based on UK Government and Lord Chancellors Office
request.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Legal Change see above
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
www.group5.net/publications/electronic.htm
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Will be updated as required. Being translated into several languages
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
European Electronic
Signature Standardisation Initiative (EESSI)
|
|
Objective
|
Industry initiative with the support of the two ICT European
standardisation bodies, CEN and ETSI, to provide implementation frameworks in
support of the future European Directive on Electronic Signature.
Such frameworks should be built upon international standards and
other form of voluntary agreements which can be used to provide legally
recognised signatures not only across Europe, but at global level through
international cooperation.
The ultimate objective is the publication by CEN and ETSI of industry
agreed documents, relating to the technical infrastructure and
self-regulatory guidelines for certification authorities and the like. Some documents could ultimately become
European standards.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Compliance with the minimal legal framework stated by the European
Directive
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
EESSI Steering Group
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
ICT Standards Board
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
1st step (assessment of existing standards,
standardisation needs in light of market requirements, proposals for action)
achieved (July 99).
2nd step (workprogramme) in preparation for approval
before end of year after intense international consultation.
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Legal recognition of electronic signature in the open electronic
commerce environment
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector specific
|
|
Geographic
|
1st priority European Union (domain of application of the
European Directive), overall objective: international.
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
European Commission, EU Member States
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
1st step Final Report available on http://www.ict.etsi.org/
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Consult http://www.ict.etsi.org/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
ESOMAR Internet
guideline
|
|
Objective
|
To outline the main principles which must be followed in
carrying out research on (or about) the Internet and in reporting the
findings of such research with the objective to protect the interests both of
Internet respondents and of the users of Internet research findings.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Complaints procedures through ESOMAR. This guideline is
based on the principles of the ICC/ESOMAR International Code of Social and
Marketing Research which has been undersigned by all ESOMAR members, the
management of research institutes with ESOMAR members and by 68 associations
in 41 countries worldwide.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
ESOMAR
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
ADM in Germany, national
market research societies in Norway, Spain, Switzerland and Sweden as well as
Association of Swedish Advertisers and Swedish Newspapers Publishers
Association and MRA in USA
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
ESOMAR 1998
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer and business-to-business
|
|
Sector
|
Market, opinion and social research
|
|
Geographic
|
Worldwide
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Www.esomar.nl
or k.joe@esomar.nl
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Will be updated regularly as needed. Next up-date to be
available in 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
General Usage for
International Digitally Ensured Commerce (GUIDEC)
|
|
Objective
|
A set of common definitions and business-generated best practices for
certifying and "ensuring" electronic commerce to:
·
facilitate further development of solutions to security
·
identify problems in electronic commerce over the Internet
·
Act as a unifying or starting point for some of the diverging policy
approaches.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
ICC (International Chamber of Commerce)
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
November 1997
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-business
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific.
|
|
Geographic
|
International
|
|
Examples of application
|
GUIDEC has been widely referred to in the press and by industry as a
unique reference for industry best practices and harmonised definitions. It has been submitted for use as reference
material for UNCITRAL work on electronic signatures.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
None
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.iccwbo.org
Christiaan van der Valk, +33-1-49532913
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Will be updated in 1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Guideline for codes of
practice for Internet Service Providers
|
|
Objective
|
This guideline consists of 7 Chapters, 20 articles and 2 additional
rules. The objective of this guideline is to protect users (including minors)
and to realise the sound development of Internet Connection Services by the
members of Telecom Services Association of Japan by responding appropriately
to various problems (illegal or harmful content etc.) arising from providing
Internet Connection Services.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Telecom Services Association of Japan (TELESA)
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
16 February 1998
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-business; Business-to-consumer; Generic
|
|
|
Sector
|
Internet Service Providers, Telecommunications Carriers
|
|
|
Geographic
|
Japan
|
|
Examples of application
|
The association consists of 402 enterprises.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.telesa.or.jp/e_guide/e_guid01.html
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
The Guidelines will be reviewed continuously to ensure its efficacy
as a guiding principle for members of the Association.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Guidelines for Electronic
Direct Marketing
|
|
Objective
|
Electronic commerce targeting consumers in Japan
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Compulsory to the JADMA members
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Japan Direct Marketing Association(JADMA)
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Ministry of International Trade and Industry
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
19th January, 1999
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer
|
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific
|
|
|
Geographic
|
Japan
|
|
Examples of application
|
The examples as yet
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.JADMA.org
jadma@JADMA.org
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
will be amended as needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Guidelines for Protecting
Personal Information in Cyber Business
|
|
Objective
|
To provide suitable protection for personal information by
stipulating basic matters concerning the handling of personal information in
cyber business. We hope that all
business entities engaged in cyber business will review these guidelines, and
then create voluntary rules with regards to their own business in order to
promote the solid growth of cyber business in the future.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Cyber Business Association
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
17 December 1997
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer
|
|
|
Sector
|
Internet Providers
|
|
|
Geographic
|
Japan
|
|
Examples of application
|
The association comprises 115 enterprises
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.fmmc.or.jp/associations/cba/index_english.html
c/o: Foundation for Multimedia Communications (FMMC)
Nisso 22 Bldg. 5F, 1-11-10 Azabudai,
Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-0041 Japan
Tel: +81 3 3583 5811 Fax:
+81 3 3583 5813
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Guidelines for transactions
between virtual merchants and consumers
|
|
Objective
|
To promote the sound and healthy development of EC, these guidelines
have been adopted as policies aimed at companies and designed to make
transactions fair and protect the consumer, with the emphasis on preventing
trouble before it occurs.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Electronic Commerce Promotion Council of Japan (ECOM)
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
March, 1998
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer
|
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific
|
|
|
Geographic
|
International
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.ecom.or.jp/ecom_e
info@ecom.or.jp
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Will be updated regularly as needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Guidelines for Use of Smart
Cards (contact/contactless)
|
|
Objective
|
Targeting shops, businesses, and operation companies expected
introduce smart cards and systems, these guidelines address a cross section
of items to be examined and information required in the course of introducing
such systems. They address the conceivable fields or situations of
application and provide specific content related to those fields and
situations. Overall, this report amounts to an effort to promote and
facilitate the use of smart cards.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Electronic Commerce Promotion Council of Japan (ECOM)
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
March, 1998
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer
|
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific
|
|
|
Geographic
|
International
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.ecom.or.jp/ecom_e
info@ecom.or.jp
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Guidelines on Personal
Information Protection in Electronic Commerce in the Private Sector
|
|
Objective
|
To ensure the sound development of electronic commerce, all
enterprises or individual businessmen that handle personal data of consumers
in electronic commerce must take measures to protect these data. These guidelines have been prepared for
the purpose of protecting personal data handled in electronic commerce.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Electronic Commerce Promotion Council of Japan (ECOM)
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
March, 1998
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer
|
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific
|
|
|
Geographic
|
Japan/International
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.ecom.or.jp/ecom_e
info@ecom.or.jp
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Will be updated regularly as needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
High assurance general
ID-certificate with private key protected in an electronic ID-card
|
|
Objective
|
Co-operation between public and private sector in order to facilitate
common rules for strong authentication, use of digital signatures and strong
encryption during transport of data. These three basic security services can
be used for electronic commerce as well for governments’ need for a ”single
face to citizen”
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
Need for interoperability
|
Voluntary by members of the non profit organisation
Certifications by the organisation until national standardisation
decisions are made.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
SEIS – Secured Electronic Information in Society (A non-profit
organisation with c 60 organisations from both private and public sectors).
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Technical specifications and a Certification Policy (16/06/98).
Partly implemented by banks and the Swedish
Post
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Generic. All specification
published via the net. Free to be used.
|
|
Sector
|
|
|
Geographic
|
Sweden
|
|
Examples of application
|
First used in the finance sector for Internet Banking and other
payment instructions. Public catalogue services not yet available. > 50 000 users.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Members of SEIS
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
seis@seis.se www.seis.se
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
The general ID-certificate can be used for applications of any other
certificate belonging to other PKI-schemes (e.g. SET Certificates, email
certificates etc)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Hotlines against illegal
content, child pornography, and racism/discrimination on the Internet
|
|
Objective
|
Reports to these hotlines result in swift action against the reported
illegal content, where necessary in cooperation with public official an/or
police. In addition to being illegal,
illegal content has a strong negative impact on Internet in general and
specifically on the trustworthiness of the medium.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary. Working on formal
public-private partnership.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
NLIP is the Dutch ISPA (ISPA-Nl): Internet Service Providers
Association Netherlands
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Government, police
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Operational for 2 years now
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
All citizens and companies can report
|
|
|
Sector
|
Internet
|
|
|
Geographic
|
Netherlands
|
|
Examples of application
|
Many reports made to each hotline.
See for instance yearly report (in English) at http://www.meldpunt.org/
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Law department, department of the interior, police
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.nlip.nl/
http://www.meldpunt.org/
mailto:fred.eisner@nlip.nl
(president/CEO NILP)
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Organisational links being made to other European and global
initiatives, cooperation with public authorities developing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
ICC E-Terms repository
|
|
Objective
|
The ICC E-Terms repository will give users of electronic commerce
easy access to legal terms (proprietary, public or business "best
practices") used in electronic commerce, so that they can compose their
contracts fully on-line.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Incorporation of E-Terms by reference to a unique identifier is
expected to render electronic commerce terms more transparent and enforceable
for contracting parties.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
ICC (International Chamber of Commerce)
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Discussing endorsement/support with range of groups and
organisations.
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Mid 1999
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Generic
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific, but especially suitable for support of PKI
(Public Key Infrastructure).
|
|
Geographic
|
International
|
|
Examples of application
|
Not yet available
|
|
Participation public sector
|
None
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.iccwbo.org
Christiaan van der Valk, +33-1-49532913
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Will be updated regularly as needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
ICC Internet advertising
guidelines
|
|
Objective
|
Guidelines proposing standards for ethical conduct of advertisers and
marketers offering goods and services over Interactive Media to increase the
public's confidence in marketing in the interactive media, to safeguard
advertisers' freedom of expression, to minimise the incentive for
governmental regulation, and to meet reasonable consumer privacy
expectations.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Like ICC's other marketing codes, the Internet guidelines are
voluntary but serve as a global reference point for principles of ethical
behaviour by companies world-wide.
They are of a general nature so that national and sector-specific
rules can build on them.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
ICC (International Chamber of Commerce)
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
2 April 1998
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
The Guidelines set standards of ethical conduct to be observed by all
involved with advertising and marketing activities on the Internet.
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific
|
|
Geographic
|
International
|
|
Examples of application
|
The Guidelines serve as a basis for many self-regulatory
e-advertising schemes currently being set up (some examples can be found in
this Annex). They have been endorsed
by over 100 companies and associations, and supported by the Global Business
Dialogue for Electronic Commerce.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
None
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.iccwbo.org
Viviane Schiavi, +33-1-49532809
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Will be updated regularly as needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
International Content
Rating Association (ICRA)
|
|
Objective
|
Our mission is to develop, implement and manage an internationally
acceptable voluntary self-rating system which provides Internet users world
wide with the choice to limit access to content they consider harmful,
especially to children.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Every content provider must agree to terms and conditions stating
that they have not wilfully misrepresented themselves. In addition, every site is visited, spot
checks undertaken and full audit of sites conducted. An automated web crawler visits every site
to check for label integrity. We also
respond to comments, complaints and suggestions from the general public.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
RSACi, the rating system,
is owned and operated by the Internet Content Rating Association.
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
ICRA members include:
AOL Europe; Aol Inc.; Bell
Canada: British Telecom; Bertelsmann Foundation; Cable & Wireless; Demon Internet (UK); Deutsche Telekom
Online Service; Electric Network Consortium, Japan; Geotrust; EuroISPA; IBM;
Internet Watch Foundation; Microsoft; Software and Information Industries
Association; UUNet
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
RSACi the rating system was
launched in April 1996; A new system will be launched by ICRA in the summer
2000
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
The rating system is used by both content providers to self-rate
their sites and by parents and other users to block potentially harmful
material within their browsers.
|
|
Sector
|
The system is applicable to all sectors in all parts of the
world. Commercial, educational,
government, military and personal sites have all rated with RSACi.
|
|
Geographic
|
Global
|
|
Examples of application
|
Over 120,000 sites world-wide have rated with RSACi at a rate of 4,000/month. RSACi
has been implemented within both Microsoft’s Internet Explorer and Netscape’s
Navigator.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
ICRA has worked closely with government departments and agencies all
over the world. Meetings have been
held with the US Dept of Commerce, OECD, the Australian Broadcasting
Authority and the European Commission amongst others.
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Stephen Balkam; Executive Director; Internet Content Rating
Association; 3460 Olney-Laytonsville Road; Suite 202; Olney; Maryland 20832; USA; +1 301 260 8669;
info@icra.org
and
David Kerr; Secretary General; Internet
Content Rating Association; 5 Coles Lane; Oakington, Cambridge CB4 5BA; UK; +44 (1223) 23 7700;
chief@iwf.org.uk
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
A new system to be launched in the summer of 2000 to include new
rating categories and vocabulary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
International DOI
Foundation
|
|
Objective
|
To support the needs of the intellectual property community in the
digital environment, and specifically to promote and develop the use of the
Digital Object Identifier as an actionable, interoperable identifier
applicable to all items of Intellectual Property.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
An implementation of the Uniform Resource Name/ Uniform Resource
Identifier specification as defined by the IETF and W3C. Conformance to standard syntax and other
rules laid down by the Foundation and where appropriate formalised as
international standards.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
The International DOI
Foundation
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
The Foundation is an open consortium that any
organisation may join. Current
members are: CHARTER
MEMBERS: Association of
American Publishers; Academic Press/Harcourt Brace; American Chemical
Society; Blackwell Science; Elsevier Science; International Publishers
Association; Institute for Scientific Information; ISBN International; John
Wiley & Sons; MCPS/PRS/BUMA/STEMRA Alliance of European Music Rights
Societies*; Springer Verlag; International Association of Scientific,
Technical and Medical Publishers. GENERAL
MEMBERS: Addison Wesley Longman; American Mathematical Society;
Association for Computing Machinery; Associazione Italiana Editori; Authors
Licensing and Collecting Society (ALCS)*; Bokforlaget Natur Och Kultur;
Copyright Clearance Center; EDP Sciences; Houghton Mifflin; IEEE; Kluwer
Academic Publishers; Microsoft Corporation; National Music Publishers
Association; New England Journal of Medicine; OCLC Online Computer Library
Center Inc.; Publishers Licensing Society; RCP Consultants; SilverPlatter
Information; The Thomson Corporation; Xerox Corporation.
In addition, several other organisations are currently assigning DOIs
and/or working on prototype applications
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
DOIs have been issued since October 1998. The DOI system is currently under further development.
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Intellectual property rights owners and users
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific
|
|
Geographic
|
World
|
|
Examples of application
|
Persistent identification of works
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Open
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Norman Paskin, Director, International DOI Foundation
PO Box 233; Kidlington,
Oxford; OX5 1XU; U.K.; Tel: (+44) 1865 843798; Fax: (+44) 1865 843446; E
mail: n.paskin@doi.org
www.doi.org
Administrative offices:
- U.S.: The International DOI Foundation; c/o Association
of American Publishers; 50 F Street, N.W., 4th Floor; Washington, DC 20001;
Phone: (+1) 202 220 4553; Fax: (+1) 202 347 3690
- The International DOI
Foundation; c/o International Publishers Association; 3, avenue de Miremont;
CH-1206, Geneva; Switzerland;
Tel (+41) 22 830 1080; Fax (+41) 22 830 1081
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Further development of the DOI system in collaboration with existing
standard mechanisms for identification and metadata.
Appointment of multiple registration agencies and further application
development. Development of standard
tools for more sophisticated resolution of identifiers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Internet One
|
|
Objective
|
Provide identification of legitimate Internet trading companies
through an authoritative listing facilitaty associating trademarks; brand
names, company names, telephone numbers, directly with internet addresses,
URLs, IP addresses and domain names, irrespective of the country code top
level domains or generic top level domains in which registration has been
effected. Correlating "real
world" identifiers with those of the "virtual world" gives
consumers greater certainty that the entity known to them in the real world
is indeed that visible to them in the virtual world. Legitimate Internet traders register their
details against a nominal charge through a recognized domain name registrar,
Internet service web hosting company, certification authority, PTT operator
or with IN ONE directly. Users may
retrieve registered information, free of charge, using any standard Internet
browser, entering in the address line of the browser the requisite
trademark/company name/telephone nr, followed by ".io" to be
referred directly to the registered Internet site. Where multiple identical trademarks/brandnames/company names
are entered, the IN ONE system automatically generates a directory style
listing from which the user may distinguish and select their desired
company/destination. IN ONE will warn consumers within about 4 seconds of being
notified of the potential infringement that the goods or services may be
imitations of their reputable namesakes.
IN ONE leaves the determination of who is a legitimate trader up to
specialized agencies.
|
|
Enforcement mechanisms
|
On-line dispute resolution/arbitration facilities (http://internetONE.wipo.int
National courts
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Internet ONE
Research Institute for Computer Science
World Intellectual Property Organization
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Council of Internet Domain Name Registrars
World Chambers of Commerce Network
Electronic Commerce Associations
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Current
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-business and business-to-consumer
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific
|
|
Geographic
|
Global
|
|
Examples of application
|
IN ONE is the only authoritative directory on the Intenet today using
pioneering technology to a non-propietary platform.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Group of Eight Industrialized Nations, Government of Australia,
France, Germany, Korea, Soviet Union, UK, USA and European Commission.
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http:/www.io.io
Internet ONE
P.O. Box 4040
Christchurch
Dorset
BH23 1XW
Fax 44 1202 430 580
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
IN ONE is seeking additional strategic partners from all nations and
field of e-commerce. Designed in the
UK, IN ONE and its partners have servers and infrastructure in New York,
London, Amsterdam, Tokyo and Melbourne and already just under 100 partners
from 23 countries.
Readers of various Internet magazines voted IN ONE "best
consumer customer service" at the recent European Internet Industry
Awards 1999.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Memorandum of Understanding
on Open Access to Electronic Commerce for European SMEs
|
|
Objective
|
To promote technical compatibility of e-commerce systems and services
and wide acceptance of "good practices" to build confidence in the
use of electronic commerce for companies of all sizes, in particular European
SMEs. The MoU identifies important
bottlenecks in the development of electronic commerce, organizations that
play a major role in contributing to self-regulatory solutions and proposes
good practice guidelines in relevant areas.
|
|
Enforcement mechanisms
|
Voluntary. MoU signatories
have a moral obligation to adhere to the standards set out within the MoU and
may be held to it in some jurisdictions.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
The MoU Steering Committee consisted of volunteers from a variety of
business and association backgrounds.
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
The European Commission.
Associated members from Italian data protection authority and the
Greek Finance Ministry. Organizations
such as CEN/ISSS, ICC and others assisted in creating the issue inventory.
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
The MoU was finalized in March 1999 with over 130 signatories from
all sectors of economic activity.
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
All aspects of electronic commerce
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific
|
|
Geographic
|
The MoU is European is scope but global in approach
|
|
Examples of application
|
The MoU has undoubtedly had an impact on European company practice as
well as on regulatory activity in several areas within the European
Commission. It has been presented to
a wide range of governmental and business organizations.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
The European Commission played a facilitating role only and has had
no involvement in the substance of the MoU.
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
C. Paleologos, European Commission DG XIII
Email constatin.paleologos@bxl.dg13.cec.be
Drs J. de Ruiter, Head Electronic Commerce & Consultancy ABN/AMRO
Bank
Email han.de.ruiter@nl.abnamro.com
www.ispo.cec.be/ecommerce/mou/default.htm
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Upon its completion, the MoU group dissolved itself and recommended
that its work be continued within existing structures identified in the final
report. Only in the area of consumer
trust, the MoU suggested that follow-up work be done through a European Round
Table for Enhancing Consumer Confidence in the Electronic Marketplace. Discussions on the creation of such a
roundtable are ongoing with European business and consumer organizations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Model contract clauses for
transborder dataflows
|
|
Objective
|
Building on the widely supported 1992 ICC/EC/Council of Europe model
clauses, these model clauses ensure that a data subject can have redress
against a data exporter if a data importer in a country that does not provide
“adequate protection” according to the jurisdiction of the exporter violates
a privacy rule according to the laws of the country of export. As such, they are intended to bridge the
gap that has widened between some jurisdictions as a result of different
approaches to privacy protection.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Once voluntarily incorporated into a contract, the clauses become
fully enforceable both for the contracting parties and, in most legal
systems, the data subject.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
ICC (International Chamber of Commerce)
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
October 1998 – a revised version was issued in July 1999
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-business self-regulatory solution to protect personal
data.
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific.
|
|
Geographic
|
International
|
|
Examples of application
|
Not yet available for 1998 version.
1992 version has been widely applied.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
None
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.iccwbo.org
Christiaan van der Valk, +33-1-49532913
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Will be updated regularly as needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Model electronic sales
contract
|
|
Objective
|
Based on ICC's model contract for the international sale of goods,
this new online service will provide parties with tailor-made fair sales
contracts.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Once entered into, the contract is enforceable as any other. The model can be customised to meet
specific needs of parties.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
ICC (International Chamber of Commerce)
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
To be made availablein 2000.
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-business
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific.
|
|
Geographic
|
International
|
|
Examples of application
|
---
|
|
Participation public sector
|
None
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.iccwbo.org
Christiaan van der Valk, +33-1-49532913
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initiative
|
New Zealand Internet
Marketing Standards Authority (IMSA)
|
|
Objective
|
|
|
Enforcement Mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary agreements between advertisers, agencies, print and
electronic media and New Zealand based internet service providers to observe
standards required by the Fair Trading Act and related consumer protection
legislation together with the Advertising Standards Authority Voluntary Codes
of Advertising Practice and published ICC Codes and Guidelines. The agreement will require the advertiser
to accept the jurisdiction of IMSA in determining consumer complaints arising
from products and services purchased from the internet once the advertisers’
internal dispute resolution procedures have been exhausted. The implementation of a verification programme
modelled in the UK ‘Trustmark’
scheme. The scheme will be
promulgated by the New Zealand Chambers of Commerce & Industry
(administered by the Wellington Regional Chamber of Commerce). IMSA decisions will be published on a
special website, supplemented by the dissemination (free of charge) of
written decisions to the media, government bodies, advertisers and
advertising agencies. Certification
will not extend to the content of any advertisement or the conduct of the
advertiser. This is the rationale for
the separation of the certification body and the adjudication body. New Zealand experience indicates that
publicity provides the most effective method of enforcement of standards but
it is also intended to seek agreement of internet service providers to remove
sites containing offending material and to develop cross-border alliances to
achieve effective enforcement.
|
|
Leader(s) Initiative
|
Issuing Implementing Organisation
|
New Zealand Internet
Marketing Standards Authority (Inc)
|
|
Supporting Organisation(s)
|
The New Zealand Advertising Standards Authority; The New Zealand
Chambers of Commerce; The Ministry of Consumer Affairs; ICC New Zealand
National Committee of Advertising, Marketing & Distribution;
Association of New Zealand Advertisers; Association of New Zealand
Advertising Agencies; Direct Marketing Association of New Zealand
|
|
Date of Issuance
|
December 1999 (subject to consultation)
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business to consumer primarily, business to business secondary
|
|
Sector
|
All
|
|
Geographic
|
New Zealand with cross-border alliances
|
|
Examples of Application
|
The New Zealand Advertising Standards Authority has processed and
adjudicated on complaints arising from advertising on the internet. To enable implementation of a
certification process separation from the Advertising Standards Authority is
deemed preferable. The Ministry of
Consumer Affairs is seeking effective mechanisms for consumer complaint
resolution arising from internet purchases.
It supports the establishment of IMSA as the mechanism for achieving
this end.
|
|
Participation Public Sector
|
IMSA has commenced consultation with Government Agencies with the
intent of obtaining governmental recognition and endorsement of a self
regulatory regime for maintenance of
standards for advertising on the internet.
Further consultation is occurring with trade bodies associated with
advertising in New Zealand, Internet Service Providers, Chambers of Commerce
and related trade bodies.
|
|
Full Text/
Further Information
|
1) Glen Wiggs – Executive
Director; Advertising Standards
Authority
P O Box 10675, Wellington;
New Zealand; Ph: 64-4-472-7852;
Fax: 64-4-471-1785;
E-mail: asa@asa.co.nz; Web Site: www.asa.co.nz
2)
John Swan – Chair; ICC New Zealand National Committee on Marketing,
Advertising & Distribution; P O Box 10530, Wellington
New Zealand; Ph:
64-4-472-0165; Fax: 64-4-472-0162; E-mail: swan@gilbertswan.co.nz; Web Site: www.wgtn-chamber.co.nz
3)
Keith Manch; General Manager; Ministry of Consumer Affairs
P O Box 1473, Wellington;
New Zealand; Ph: 64-4-472-2905
Fax: 64-4-4739400; e-mail: manchk@moc.govt.nz; Web Site: www.consumer-ministry
.govt.nz
|
|
Evolution
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
The
Online Mark System for Winning
Trust for Electronic Commerce
|
|
Objective
|
To help
consumers avoid trouble with false or deceptive EC merchants.
The seal of approval are displayed on the homepages of EC merchants
known to be engaged in legitimate business .
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Issuing/implementing
organisation ; Electoronic Commerce Promotion Council of Japan(ECOM)
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
March,1999
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer
|
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific
|
|
|
Geographic
|
Japan(For the shops whose headquarters are in Japan)
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.ecom.or.jp/ecom_e
info@ecom.or.jp
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Will be updated as needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Online Ombuds Office
|
|
Objective
|
Online mediation and arbitration services
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Center for Information Technology and Dispute Resolution
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
University of Massachusetts
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Established in 1996
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Internet related disputes
|
|
Sector
|
Commercial and Non-commercial
|
|
Geographic
|
International and Domestic
|
|
Examples of application
|
Domain name disputes, consumer, intellectual property
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
www.ombuds.org, www.umass/dispute
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
The Online Privacy Alliance
(OPA)
|
|
Objective
|
The Online Privacy Alliance's objective is to enhance an individual's
trust in online activities and electronic commerce by promoting effective
protection of personally identifiable information. The OPA proposes to
empower individuals by requiring its members to adopt and implement privacy policies
that include notice and disclosure, choice, data security, and data quality
and appropriate access. Other
elements of the OPA program include a set of privacy principles specifically
designed for children under the age of 13, and redress/enforcement (see
below) encouraging the creation of third party accountability systems.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
The OPA's enforcement mechanism is based on an assumption of industry
self-governance and is consistent with the U.S system of checks and
balances. OPA members commit
themselves to participate in effective and appropriate self-regulatory
enforcement activities and mechanisms.
OPA believes that validation that organisations are engaged in
meaningful self-regulation of online privacy by an independent trusted third
party may be necessary to grow consumer confidence. OPA believes that such validation can be best delivered through
"seals" which can be made easily recognisable in the market. The authority of federal and state law
enforcement agencies to prosecute for deception those who claim to abide by
such third party programs but do not, serves as an anchor for the voluntary
enforcement programs.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
The OPA sponsors consist of more than 85 leading U.S. companies and
industry associations who reach all American individuals on the Internet.
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
The OPA launched its programs on June 22, 1998.
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer and Business-to-Business(user)
|
|
|
Sector
|
cross-sectoral
|
|
|
Geographic
|
The United States of America
|
|
Examples of application
|
OPA engages in significant business outreach to
promote the posting of privacy policies.
This outreach has greatly contributed to the increase of posted
privacy policies on websites from 14% in March 1998 to 60% with the top 100
websites increasing from 71% to 94.4%."
|
|
Participation public sector
|
The OPA consulted broadly with the U.S. Government and consumer
advocates and actively participated in consultations sponsored by the U.S.
Government that brought together U.S. business and consumer and privacy
advocates.
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
www.privacyalliance.org
Christine Varney
Hogan & Hartson
555 Thirteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
tel: 202/637-7284
fax: 202/637-5910
email: CAVarney@hhlaw.com
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
The OPA will work to create awareness within industry for the need to
post privacy policies on websites consistent with the OPA principles and will
work with third party programs to ensure that outreach to industry is a
long-term initiative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
PKI Assessment Guidelines
|
|
Objective
|
Describe the relevant components of a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)
and provide guidelines to assist
certification authorities, relying parties, and other communities of
interest, licensing or regulatory (including consumer protection) bodies,
communities of interest, and others in making independent assessments of PKI
trustworthiness. In particular, the
PAG:
·
provides a framework and guidelines for
assessment of a PKI and PKI components, but does not mandate any particular
criteria or conclusions;
·
explains the basics of PKI assessment covering
such topics as relevant terminology, and a tutorial;
·
provides assistance in the drafting and
analysis of certificate policies, certification practice statements; relying
party agreements, and subscriber agreements, and
·
includes various useful annexes, including sample
scenarios and corresponding considerations for "typical"
trustworthy transactions that are intended to enhance interoperability and
certainty.
The PAG is a logical extension of the Digital
Signature Guidelines, (the "DSG"), a four and 1/2-year project of
the American Bar Association's Information Security
Committee published in August 1996. Although the focus and scope of the DSG
and PAG differ, both are the product of intensive collaboration among
technical, legal, business, and auditing professionals from around the world.
Both are intended to facilitate secure electronic commerce.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary adoption
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Information Security Committee of the American Bar Association
Information’s Section of Science and Technology.
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
In informal cooperation with diverse private and public entities.
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Sometime during 2000.
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-business as well as consumer-to-business also addresses
government-to-citizen
|
|
Sector
|
Non-sector specific
|
|
Geographic
|
Global in scope
|
|
Examples of application
|
Quality assessment, evaluation for interoperability, underpinnings of
seal programs, and basis for licensure.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Considerable – informal and incremental participation in the ISC’s
drafting of the PAG
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Michael Baum, Chair, Information Security Committee:
michael@verisign.com; Ruven Schwartz,
Vice Chair, Information Security Committee, ruven.schwartz@westgroup; or S&T Section Manager Ann Kowalsky:
KowalskyA@STAFF.ABANET.ORG
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Updated quarterly, indefinitely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Initiative
|
Platform for Privacy
Preferences (P3P)
|
|
Objective
|
Build privacy protection and personal information management tools
into the infrastructure of the World Wide Web
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
P3P is a voluntary technical specification
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
World Wide Web Consortium
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
330+ W3C member organizations around the world
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Fall 1999
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Privacy protection
|
|
Sector
|
|
|
Geographic
|
Global
|
|
Examples of application
|
Ecommerce services on the Web provide users information about site’s
privacy practices and give users control over handling of personal
information according to the users individual preferences
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Active consultation with US Government, European Commission, and
other national governments
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Daniel J. Weitzner, Technology and Society Domain Leader, <djweitzner@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/p3p
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
P3P may be the platform for empowering consumers to address onsumer
protection and choice of law issues in a global environment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Security Guidelines for
Smart Card Electronic Money Systems
|
|
Objective
|
To analyse the potential threats to smart card electronic money
systems and summarise the security function requisites for electronic money
systems. This report has been compiled primarily for system engineers (SE)
and others involved in building electronic money systems.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Electronic Commerce Promotion Council of Japan (ECOM)
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
April, 1998
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer
|
|
Sector
|
Financial institution as issuer
|
|
Geographic
|
International
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.ecom.or.jp/ecom_e
info@ecom.or.jp
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Self-regulation for
e-commerce marketing
|
|
Objective
|
·
to enhance consumer trust and confidence on
electronic commerce;
·
to promote best business practices for
electronic commerce & therefore promote the growth of e-commerce in
Europe.
These objectives would be achieved through the
implementation of seven key elements which take into full consideration
present consumer concerns: European Code of Conduct, European Guarantee Seal,
Enforcement Mechanisms, Monitoring and Surveillance, Specific Software tools,
specific services and awareness campaign.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
A company signs a license agreement committing to respect the code of
conduct and enforcement mechanisms. An Enforcement Committee composed by
business and consumers will revise any complaints on non-compliance of the
code of conduct.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Federation of European Direct Marketing, FEDMA
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
National Direct Marketing Associations in Europe
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Mid-2000
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer
|
|
Sector
|
Any company having a web site
|
|
Geographic
|
Europe
|
|
Examples of application
|
FEDMA has 500 direct company members and 17 national direct marketing
associations which makes an overall of around 8000 companies.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Only in funding
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Alastair Tempest: atempest@fedma.org
Asunción Caparrós: acaparros@fedma.org
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
The whole project could be developed internationally through the
International Federation of Direct Marketing Associations (IFDMA).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
The Standard for Internet
Commerce
|
|
Objective
|
The primary goal of The Commerce Standard is to advance global
Internet
commerce by catalysing the adoption of merchant practices that:
-Increase consumer satisfaction, confidence and trust.
-Improve merchant profitability and innovation.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
To be developed
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Global Information Infrastructure (GII) – a Ziff Davis business
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
More than 250 CEOs from business, I(N)GOs and academic institutions
from Europe and US
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
December 1999
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business to consumer
|
|
Sector
|
Non-sector specific
|
|
Geographic
|
Global
|
|
Examples of application
|
Not implemented yet
|
|
Participation public sector
|
Yes
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Jim Hake, Founder and Chairman, jim@gii.com
http://www.commercestandard.com,
http://www.gii.com;
Rivka Tadjer, Editor, rivkat@mindspring.com;
Melanie McMullern, General Manager, GII, Melanie_McMullen@zd.com
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Is growing into multi-stakeholder non-profit organisation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Initiative
|
SILEC
(Inter-American Society for the Freedom of Commercial Speech)
|
|
Objective
|
To defend freedom of
commercial speech and to fight for recognition of the consumer's right to be
fully informed regarding all lawful products throughout Latin America. Three main lines of action: (1) communication
of the doctrine of freedom of commercial speech; (2) promotion of advertising
self-regulation; (3) dialogue with legislators and government.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary acceptance of our guidelines, norms and recommendation by
the leaders and other members of the advertising industry. We work through bi-annual regional
assemblies, symposia, seminars, conferences, alliances, meetings with
government authorities, publications, etc.
We strongly promote industry self-regulation through a council formed
by advertisers, advertising agencies and the media, using the ICC code of
ethics as a guide. Finally, due to
the increase of globalization of advertising and growth in Internet usage and
e-commerce throughout the region, we are also trying to create a Regional
Self-Regulation Alliance with the objective of improving and/or promoting
self-regulation and develop a complaint system for cross-border advertising.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
SILEC is formed by 14 Latin American countries' advertisers,
advertising agencies and the media, represented by their trade
associations. Working with trade
associations allows us to act quickly and efficiently.
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Our efforts are also supported by – among others – the International
Advertising Association (IAA).
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
SILEC was founded in Caracas, Venezuela on August 9, 1992
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-Business action / observations. However, the implementation of self-regulation is aimed at
giving consumers confidence in advertising and reducing incentives for
government regulation.
|
|
Sector
|
The advertising industry
|
|
Geographic
|
Latin American region
|
|
Examples of application
|
SILEC has caused the number of self-regulation systems in the region
to double from 4 to 8 since its inception.
Awareness of the value and importance of self-regulation has been
significantly heightened among Latin American industry leaders. Governments in the region have changed
their attitude toward self-regulation for advertising as a possible
substitute to legislative restrictions.
We have achieved higher ethical standards among professionals leading
the advertising and communications industry.
The initiative has also prevented the enactment of laws that would
restrict or prohibit advertising for lawful products.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
None
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
José M. Gonzalez-Llorente
PMB 406
1172 South Dixie Highway
Coral Gables, Fl 33146-2918
USA
Fax: +1-305-661 8017
e-mail: jgllorente@aom.com
www.silecinternacional.com
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
Affiliation of the remaining 5 Latin American countries. Creation of a culture of freedom of
commercial speech, ethics and responsibility in advertising in Latin American
markets. The conversion of Latin
America into a self-regulated region in the next 5 years. The education of new generations of
advertising professionals on the subject of ethics and self-regulation. The inception of a Latin American
Self-Regulation Alliance to improve existing self-regulation, promote it in
the markets where this practice does not exist, and develop a complaint system
for cross-border advertising. And as a
result of all that, avoid unwarranted government regulation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
Testbedding and Evaluation
Model for Shopping Mall Construction Technologies (Mall Expression, Display,
and Operability)
|
|
Objective
|
This guidelines is to perform selective prototype evaluation on
matters relating to mall expression, display, and operability, particularly
from the viewpoint of consumer convenience and cost effectiveness of
implementation.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
Electronic Commerce Promotion Council of Japan (ECOM)
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
March, 1998
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer
|
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific
|
|
|
Geographic
|
Japan (nation wide)
|
|
Examples of application
|
Not yet available
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.ecom.or.jp/ecom_e
info@ecom.or.jp
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
TradeCard
|
|
Objective
|
To create an electronic network that enables buyers and sellers to
comply against documents needed for trade transactions and settle payment
based upon compliance.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Membership Contract
ICC guidelines
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
TradeCard Inc.
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
WTCA (World Trade Centers Association)
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
First Quarter 2000
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business to business
|
|
Sector
|
Import/Export Community
|
|
Geographic
|
Global
|
|
Examples of application
|
Currently in pilot with some of the world’s leading international
businesses
|
|
Participation public sector
|
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Michael Klausner, VP, Marketing
mklausner@tradecard.com
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
To reduce the barriers to trade
To simplify and innovate the current trade finance process
To increase the volume of world trade
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Initiative
|
TRUSTe
|
|
Objective
|
Building consumer trust and
confidence in e-commerce by empowering users to decide how their personally
identifiable information will be used by the Web site. To educate site developers on the
importance of demonstrating the site’s commitment to addressing online
privacy to both consumers and governments.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Sites that choose to become licensees of the TRUSTe program must sign
a one-year contractually binding licensing agreement. The agreement must be renewed each
year. The agreement stipulates
conditions by which the licensee must adhere, including privacy principles
and escalation procedures. The site must demonstrate, to TRUSTe’s
satisfaction, compliance with the TRUSTe privacy principles prior to
obtaining the TRUSTe seal or trustmark. Over the course of the contract,
subsequent reviews will be conducted by TRUSTe to ensure the site is in
compliance with TRUSTe’s privacy principles and their own stated privacy
practices. A variety of mechanisms
including offsite surfing of the site and “seeding” technologies are also
used.
The TRUSTe program also includes a consumer dispute resolution where
consumers can voice concerns about TRUSTe licensees should their interactions
with the licensee prove unsatisfactory.
Complaints generated by either a consumer or TRUSTe follow a
progressive escalation process that is dictated by the licensing
agreement. Sites have agreed, by
signing the contract, to cooperate with TRUSTe’s review and escalation process.
TRUSTe also offers its special Children's privacy Seal, which has heightened
requireme,y for websites directed at children under 13.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
TRUSTe—the digital industry’s only non-profit, self-regulatory effort
focusing exclusively on individual privacy rights online.
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Founding Organisations:
Electronic Frontier Foundation, CommerceNet Consortium
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
Commercial launch of the program:
June 1997
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-consumer primarily, business-to-business secondarily
|
|
Sector
|
All
|
|
Geographic
|
US, with presence established in Europe and Asia
|
|
Examples of application
|
# of licensees: 850 sites as
of July 15, 1999
Influence of licensees: 15 of
top 20 most visited sites, including all major Internet portals are TRUSTe
licensees. It is estimated that
TRUSTe licensees reach 90% of US Internet users.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
TRUSTe has participated at a number of US government-sponsored forums
including the FTC Privacy Workshop, the Department of Commerce Privacy Forum
and privacy workshops. In addition,
TRUSTe has testified at congressional hearings and has presented its program
internationally to OECD-led privacy workshops.
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
www.truste.org
Paula J. Bruening
Pbruening@truste.org
1816 S St Nw
Washington DC 20009
1-202-484-1900
1-408-342-1950
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
The TRUSTe program has evolved in the 2 years since its commercial
launch. It is anticipated that
further developments and changes will occur as market and government forces
dictate. Global expansion of the
program is planned in 1999.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
TTP.NL
|
|
Objective
|
To stimulate the development of secure and trusted communication and
storage of electronic information by developing a national, interoperable
TTP-infrastructure which is in harmony with current market developments and
needs. In the project TTP.NL working groups develop criteria that TTPs should
comply with, an accreditation- and certification scheme and a supervising
body that TTPs can join voluntarily.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Accreditation- and certification scheme ( to which TTP's can
voluntarily adhere). Possibly a quality-mark for TTP's that participate.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
The Confederation of Netherlands Industry and Employers(VNO-NCW); the
Dutch Ministries of Economic Affairs; Transport, Public Works & Water
Management; the Dutch Electronic Commerce Platform (ECP.NL)
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
Representatives of providers and users of TTP-services (a.o.
notaries, post and banks), the Dutch private sector (a.o. consumer
organisations, universities & large businesses).
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
End of 1999
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-business; Business-to-consumer
|
|
|
Sector
|
All sectors
|
|
|
Geographic
|
|
|
Examples of application
|
|
|
Participation public sector
|
See "leaders initiative"
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
Arie-van.bellen@ecp.nl (Mr. Arie van Bellen)
Nicolette.docter@ecp.nl (Ms. Nicolette Docter)
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
In the timeframe of the project, it is expected that the necessary
infrastructure and "tools" for the development of TTP-services in
the Netherlands should be completed. During the project all relevant market
parties will be consulted and informed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
URETS (Uniform Rules for
Electronic Trade and Settlement)
|
|
Objective
|
These high-level rules are intended to bridge gaps in the current
framework of best practice trade rules and laws to facilitate electronic
trade in a completely "open" environment as well as exchanges with
the assistance of a central registry.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary but binding once incorporated or referred to in contract.
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
ICC (International Chamber of Commerce)
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
---
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
To be published in 1999
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Business-to-business
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific
|
|
Geographic
|
International
|
|
Examples of application
|
Not yet available
|
|
Participation public sector
|
None
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.iccwbo.org
Christiaan van der Valk +33-1-49532913
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of initiative
|
World Chambers Network
(WCN)
|
|
Objective
|
WCN allows chambers of commerce to promote their companies to the
world and to network with other chambers of commerce around the world. Through their local chamber’s
participation, SME’s have access to a global electronic network on the
Internet for the exchange of business information and opportunities.
|
|
Enforcement mechanism(s)
|
Voluntary
|
|
Leader(s) initiative
|
Issuing/
implementing organisation(s)
|
ICC (International Chamber of Commerce)
|
|
|
Supporting organisation(s)
|
IBCC (International Bureau of Chambers of Commerce)
Paris Chamber of Commerce and Industry
G77 Chambers Trade Network
|
|
[expected] Date of issuance / implementation
|
1994
|
|
Scope
|
General
|
Chamber-to-chamber. Business-to-business.
|
|
Sector
|
Non sector-specific.
|
|
Geographic
|
International
|
|
Examples of application
|
A company that sells ergonomic pens opened
business contacts with one of the largest office supply chains in the United
States. A Swedish dental equipment importer is now doing business with China
and a thermal cushion manufacturer found an agent in the Netherlands.
|
|
Participation public sector
|
None
|
|
For full text/further information consult/contact
|
http://www.worldchambers.com
Anthony Parkes, +33-1-49532967
|
|
Possible/expected evolution of the initiative
|
WCN will link into its system, the products and services of the
chambers of commerce around the world. The network will expand its qualified,
validated business opportunity service, providing a higher level of trust
through the intervention of trusted third parties - chambers of commerce.
|
|
|
|
|
About the Alliance for Global Business
The Alliance for Global Business (AGB, "the Alliance") is a
co-ordinating mechanism of leading international business organisations created
to provide private sector leadership on information society issues and
electronic commerce. Jointly, these
organisations represent the bulk of electronic commerce in almost all countries
in the world. The coalition represents
a diverse cross section of business in over 140 countries. Membership includes providers and users of
information technology, large multinational enterprises and small start-ups,
and companies in developing as well as developed economies.
The AGB's founding members are:
BIAC – Business and
Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD (www.biac.org)
The Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD (BIAC) is the
voice of business from the economically advanced democratic nations of the
world. Recognised by the OECD since
1962 as its business advisory counterpart, BIAC has the mission of ensuring
that the OECD hears a broad-based, considered business advice on all sectors of
activity that it embarks upon. BIAC's
membership consists of the principal industrial and employers' organisations of
the OECD Member countries. These
represent the majority in terms of employment, output, assets and investment by
the private sector in the advanced market economies. Over the years BIAC, its member organisations, and their member
companies have been deeply involved in the work of OECD on information and
communications and electronic commerce, through direct participation in OECD
committees as observer and by providing technical and policy advice to various
processes that develop OECD instruments such as the 1980 "Privacy
Guidelines" or more recent work on cryptography policy.
GIIC - Forum
for the Global Information Infrastructure
(www.giic.org)
Launched in 1995, the Forum for the Global Information Infrastructure (GIIC) is a private sector advocacy group
bringing together 50+ CEOs and Presidents of major international corporations
with a stake in the development of the GII.
GIIC members are from both developed and developing countries. The GIIC serves as a bridge between diverse
players and business communities around the world, thus fostering the global
dialogue necessary to address critical issues in building the global
information infrastructure. The GIIC
has established on-going policy dialogues with governments and international
organisations, providing them with pragmatic advice and input as they
transition to the new body of policies and laws needed to support a secure,
seamless global communications environment and marketplace. Four main thrusts of GIIC activity are: 1)
facilitating the creation of harmonised rules to support global electronic
commerce; 2) bringing developing countries into the process of building the
global information economy; 3) spurring the reform of education systems to
prepare for the Information Age; and 4) fostering an open environment for the
development of information infrastructure and services. GIIC membership is representative of all the
major elements of the information technology sector, including
telecommunications hardware and services providers, computer hardware and
software companies, cable, broadcast, and publishing companies, new satellite
companies, international organisations, governments, and academics. The GIIC’s regional co-chairs are H. Brian
Thompson, (chairman and CEO of Universal Telecommunications), Volker Jung,
(executive vice president, member of the managing board, Siemens), and Michio
Naruto (vice chairman, Fujitsu). W.
Bowman Cutter (managing director of E.M. Warburg Pincus) acts as the GIIC managing
director.
ICC -
International Chamber of Commerce (www.iccwbo.org)
ICC is the world business organization. With corporate and business organisation membership in more than
130 countries, it is the only representative body that speaks with authority on
behalf of enterprises from all sectors in every part of the world. Founded in 1919, ICC's purpose is to promote
an open international trade and investment system and the market economy
world-wide. Its rules for international
trade transactions and trade finance are accepted globally by traders,
governments and judges. The ICC
International Court of Arbitration is the world's leading institution of its
kind. ICC brings together executives and experts from all sectors of business
to establish the business stance on broad issues of trade and investment policy
as well as on vital technical or legal subjects. The ICC's broad framework of rules for international trade and
commerce evolves continuously to take into account changes in business
practice. ICC has issued best practice
rules for electronic commerce since the 1980s and continues to harmonise
business rules and practices to meet the needs of the information society.
INTUG - International
Telecommunication Users Group (www.intug.net)
INTUG is an international association of users of communications
technology and applications. It has an
extremely wide constituency. Founded in
1974, it has its Secretariat in Brussels where it is registered as an
international non-profit organisation.
It meets in plenary session four times a year. Members include national users groups which represent the
interests of users in Europe, the Americas, Asia-Pacific and Africa. Associate
and individual members come from major multinational enterprises, academia, law
and other relevant industry sectors.
Many of INTUG’s member groups have been particularly successful in their
interaction with national government policy makers; also in regional economic
policy forums. INTUG itself promotes
the interests of all users at the international level and ensures that the
voice of the user is clearly heard whenever communications policy issues are
addressed. Its Special Interest Group
on Y2K issues has been extremely active and was a specific focus of the INTUG
meeting in Brussels in June 1998.
WITSA - World
Information Technology and Services Alliance (www.witsa.org)
The World Information Technology and Services Alliance (WITSA) is a
consortium of information technology industry associations from economies
around the world. Serving as the global voice of the information technology
industry, WITSA is dedicated to:
·
advocating policies that advance the industry’s growth and development;
·
facilitating international trade and investment in information
technology products and services; and
·
providing members with a vast network of contacts in nearly every
geographic region of the world.
WITSA:
·
serves as a forum for the identification of common issues and views;
·
formulates positions on information technology issues, including the
recently concluded World Trade Organisation (WTO) Agreement on Basic
Telecommunications Services;
·
voices the concerns of the international information technology
community at multilateral organisations including the WTO, the World
Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), the G-7 and other international fora
where policies affecting industry interests are developed;
·
provides information on international marketing and business
development;
·
promotes information sharing on information technology policy
developments throughout the world; and
·
hosts the biannual World Congress on Information Technology.
Business and
Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD (BIAC)
Forum for the
Global Information Infrastructure (GIIC)
International
Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
International
Telecommunication Users Group (INTUG)
World Information
Technology and Services Alliance (WITSA)
The terms “digital signature” and “electronic signature” are often
used interchangeably. This had led to
significant international confusion as to the use of the term. This topic is not appropriate for an
in-depth discussion in this paper. We
refer interested parties to http://www.iccwbo.org/home/guidec/guidec.asp
or www.ilpf.org/work/ca/draft.htm and related
information sources for further information and definitions. For the purpose of clarity, the term
“digital signature” as used in this document refers to “a transformation of a message using an
asymmetric cryptosystem such that a person having the ensured message and the
ensurer’s public key can accurately determine: (a) whether the transformation
was created using the private key that corresponds to the signer's public key,
and (b) whether the signed message has been altered since the transformation
was made.” The term
“electronic signature” as used in this document refers to “a signature in electronic form in, or attached to, or logically
associated with, a data message, and used by or on behalf of a person with the
intent to identify that person and to indicate that person’s approval of the
contents of the data message.”
|