library Email this page members only
about uscib global network what's new
    Search      
Home Policy Advocacy: USCIB Committees and Working Groups Dispute Resolution: USCIB and ICC Arbitration Calendar of Events: USCIB and Partner Events Trade Services: USCIB Services to Facilitate U.S. Exports/Imports ATA Carnet: USCIB's Duty-Free and Tax-Free Temporary Exports/Imports
USCIB

Committee Officers

APEC

Banking

Biotechnology

China

Competition

Corporate Responsibility

Customs & Trade Facilitation

Energy

Environment

European Union

Financial Services

Food & Agriculture

Health Care

Information, Communications & Technology

Intellectual Property

Labor & Employment

Marketing & Advertising

Nanotechnology

Product Policy

Taxation

Trade and Investment

Transportation

contact us
membership info
membership info

Positions and Statements

 

 

USCIB Letter to Commerce Secretary Mineta on the Euopean Initiative

to Create a "Management System Standard" for Data Privacy

 

VIA FACSIMILE

 

October 24, 2000

 

The Honorable Norman Y. Mineta

Secretary of Commerce

Room 5854

U.S. Department of Commerce

14th and Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC  20230

 

Dear Secretary Mineta:

 

I am writing to express the concern of our members regarding a European initiative to create a "management system standard" for data privacy under the auspices of CEN/ISSS.  USCIB members have consistently opposed the development of a privacy standard.  Our members believe that such a standard is not needed given the international consensus regarding the appropriate balance of effective privacy protection and the free flow of information espoused in the 1980 OECD Privacy Guidelines.  In fact, the OECD Ministerial Declaration on the Protection of Privacy on Global Networks issued in Ottawa, Canada in October 1998 states:  ". . . that the technology-neutral principles of the 1980 OECD Privacy Guidelines continue to represent international consensus and guidance concerning the collection and handling of personal data in any medium, and provide a foundation for privacy protection on global networks. . ."

 

Given this international consensus, our members strongly believe that there is no need for a European privacy standard.  Moreover, the adoption of a European standard can have international ramifications.  Bilaterally, it could impact the implementation of the Safe Harbor Arrangement.  The Safe Harbor Arrangement already requires U.S. based companies participating in the Safe Harbor to handle personally identifiable data relating to E.U. citizens in a particular manner.  A European privacy standard could impose additional costs to companies that conduct business between the E.U. and the U.S. by requiring the use of specific tools exclusively dedicated to handle all personally identifiable information consistent with the privacy standard, even though the standard exceeds the definition of fair information practices within the U.S.

 

Additionally, the creation of a European privacy standard could be introduced to the International Standards Organization (ISO) as the basis for an international standard.  ISO has already contemplated and rejected the idea of an international privacy standard. Indeed, ISO correctly determined that a privacy management system could not bridge the vastly different cultural, legal, regulatory and philosophical approaches to data privacy.

 

However, a CEN/ISSS standard could circumvent the normal ISO procedure through a "fast-track" process.  A "fast-track" procedure, if approved by the relevant ISO body, can limit debate on the standard providing only a single opportunity for comments on the standard as submitted, and then a vote.  If a two-thirds majority casts a vote in favor of the standard and not more than one-quarter of the total number of votes cast oppose it, the draft standard will proceed to a final vote of all the ISO member bodies with the same supra-majority required as set forth above.

 

In summary, a European privacy standard could have significant ramifications for U.S. business.  We hope that the U.S. Government and the Department of Commerce in particular will continue their active engagement with their European counterparts on this very important issue.

 

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding these comments.

 

Sincerely,

 

Thomas M.T. Niles

 

Cc:       Mr. Robert LaRussa, Undersecretary for International Trade, Department of Commerce

            Mr. Peter Swire, Chief Counselor for Privacy, Office of Management and Budget

Mr. Elliot Maxwell, Special Advisor to the Secretary on the Digital Economy, Department of State

            Mr. Raymond Kammer, Director, National Institute of Standards and Technology

 

 

 

 





ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2014 | PRIVACY POLICY STATEMENT | CONTACT US