library Email this page members only
about uscib global network what's new
    Search      
Home Policy Advocacy: USCIB Committees and Working Groups Dispute Resolution: USCIB and ICC Arbitration Calendar of Events: USCIB and Partner Events Trade Services: USCIB Services to Facilitate U.S. Exports/Imports ATA Carnet: USCIB's Duty-Free and Tax-Free Temporary Exports/Imports
USCIB

Committee Officers

Arbitration

Banking

Biotechnology

China

Competition

Corporate Responsibility

Customs & Trade Facilitation

Emerging Markets

Energy

Environment

European Union

Financial Services

Food & Agriculture

Health Care

Information, Communications & Technology

Intellectual Property

Labor & Employment

Manhattan India Investment Roundtable

Marketing & Advertising

Nanotechnology

Product Policy

Taxation

Trade and Investment

Transportation

contact us
membership info
membership info

Positions and Statements

 

 

Letter from USCIB President Thomas Niles

to the Financial Times on Climate Change

 

April 23, 2001

 

 

Letters to the Editor

Financial Times

1330 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY  10019

Fax: (212) 641-6504

 

Sir:

 

You mischaracterize a recent statement by the United States Council for International Business on climate change (“Raising the temperature,” Comment & Analysis, April 18).

 

First, we welcomed President Bush’s decision to embark upon a major study assessing practical means to address the problems of climate change, not the decision to abandon the Kyoto Protocol.  Second, far from seeking to minimize the impact of global warming, our statement in fact called for renewed international action to move forward with climate negotiations.

 

Our members, who form a cross-section of U.S. industry, believe that governments must focus on the long-term development, commercialization and diffusion of advanced technologies to reduce and sequester carbon emissions.  An international agreement on climate should also seek to utilize market incentives and mechanisms, something the Kyoto approach does not sufficiently achieve, even after six “Conferences of the Parties.”

 

Pro-active reductions in emissions by many U.S. companies, as well as their continued development of new technologies to deal with greenhouse gases, are wholly compatible with this positive approach.   Business is more unified on these points than your article suggests.

 

Sincerely,

 

Thomas M.T. Niles

President, United States Council for International Business

1212 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY  10036

Tel: (212) 703-5055 (office) or (914) 713-0190 (home)

E-mail: tniles@uscib.org                        

                                                     

 

 

 

 





ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2013 | PRIVACY POLICY STATEMENT | CONTACT US