library Email this page members only
about uscib global network what's new
    Search      
Home Policy Advocacy: USCIB Committees and Working Groups Dispute Resolution: USCIB and ICC Arbitration Calendar of Events: USCIB and Partner Events Trade Services: USCIB Services to Facilitate U.S. Exports/Imports ATA Carnet: USCIB's Duty-Free and Tax-Free Temporary Exports/Imports
USCIB

Committee Officers

Arbitration

Banking

Biotechnology

China

Competition

Corporate Responsibility

Customs & Trade Facilitation

Emerging Markets

Energy

Environment

European Union

Financial Services

Food & Agriculture

Health Care

Information, Communications & Technology

Intellectual Property

Labor & Employment

Manhattan India Investment Roundtable

Marketing & Advertising

Nanotechnology

Product Policy

Taxation

Trade and Investment

Transportation

contact us
membership info
membership info

Op-eds and Speeches

Financial Times

 

April 27, 2006

 

Letters to the editor:

Doha: let us get away from realm of one-upmanship

 

From Mr Thomas R. Vant.

 

Sir, A defeatist attitude surrounds the World Trade Organisation negotiations on the Doha development agenda (DDA) that is painful for the world to watch. WTO members' failure to agree on their self-imposed April 30 deadline (report, April 24) for a deal on agriculture and industrial goods took no one by surprise. It was merely the most recent chapter in a long story of missed opportunities to show real commitment to delivering the great benefits of free trade to the world.

 

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development business community does not have the luxury of taking a defeatist stance or playing the blame game. The 8m-plus companies our members represent urgently need meaningful results from the DDA. The WTO round is all about new opportunities for economic growth, promoting development, creating jobs and prosperity for us all, but especially for the less developed countries. It is in the hands of trade ministers from developed and developing countries to create these opportunities through the genuine and mutually beneficial liberalisation of trade in agriculture, industrial goods and services. Failure to conclude the round would squander the achievements made to date and would dissolve the very substantial welfare gains ahead for developed and developing countries. And, as Jorma Ollila and Peter Sutherland say ("Business is fearful as Doha nears the precipice", April 24), it would also seriously undermine the credibility of the multilateral trading system, which has been the greatest achievement to date of international co-operation in the economic arena.

 

By missing the end-of-April deadline, negotiators have again kicked the can further down the road, making the end of July the likely "make-or-break" moment. For practical reasons, the negotiations must be concluded by the end of 2006. Time is running out. Therefore, policy leaders must now take the process out of the realm of one-upmanship and give negotiators the green light they need to make a real difference. Pushing aside the remaining stumbling blocks in key negotiating areas may be difficult, but it is certainly achievable with far-sighted vision and determination on the part of policymakers. What countries and business - and all of us as citizens - have to gain at the end of the day makes this effort seem small in comparison.

 

Thomas R. Vant,

Secretary General,

Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD (BIAC),

75016, Paris France

 

ICC CEO op-ed, “Doha Can Still Be Won” (Wall Street Journal, April 27, 2006)

 

More on USCIB’s Trade Policy Committee

 

BIAC website

 

Financial Times website

 





ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2013 | PRIVACY POLICY STATEMENT | CONTACT US