|
The G20 summit resulted in a clear understanding that European governments must move beyond austerity in an effort to restart global growth, and developments in the eurozone since the summit have been somewhat encouraging. Clearly the G20 is an important mechanism to coordinate responses in a crisis, and it is fulfilling that mandate once again.
G20 governments also renewed their pledge to avoid protectionist measures that could derail growth. And the summit provided strong impetus to move ahead on bringing Canada and Mexico into the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade talks.
An active business role
In Los Cabos, even more than at previous summits, the business community played a very active role. CEOs and other business leaders held their own summit, the B20, meeting with many of the G20 leaders. The private sector put forward an agenda to spur growth by improving access to capital, rolling back trade and investment protectionism, and protecting intellectual property rights, among other measures.
Via the International Chamber of Commerce, business also unveiled a scorecard to hold G20 leaders accountable for living up to their pledges (an initiative that was actually welcomed by a number of government leaders).
In short, while the ultimate form and scope of business input to the G20 going forward remains to be determined, Mexico set a clear precedent that private-sector views should be sought out and can be successfully integrated into the summit process. This is important, because the full cooperation from the business community is essential to implement and follow up on decisions made by G20 leaders.
Focus on results
The results were a bit more mixed at Rio+20. Here is our scorecard:
· First, what gets measured gets managed, and we were pleased that UN members agreed to develop better metrics and indicators to gauge progress toward a greener economy. But companies still want a commitment to use trade as a “carrot” rather than a “stick,” to keep markets open and encourage developing countries to realize the positive side of moving to more sustainable models of development.
· Second, business requires predictability in order to plan and invest for the future. While the final outcome document in Rio recognized the need to square economic and environmental policies, and the importance of R&D, it was skewed to environmental, rather than economic, approaches. The Rio+20 process clearly would have benefited from greater participation from economic, commerce and trade ministries.
· Finally, we were disappointed that the Rio+20 outcomes almost completely ignore the need for business to be involved in the process of building a greener economy. If we truly want to re-launch growth and lay the groundwork for a better, more sustainable world for our children, the private sector needs to play a major role.
Overall, the G20 and Rio+20 summits underscored the importance of having a manageable process and reasonable expectations going into major summits. We would say that Los Cabos passed that test, while Rio rated an “incomplete.”
Mr. Robinson’s bio and contact information
Other recent postings from Mr. Robinson:
Education for the 21st Century (Summer 2012)
Ensuring a Dynamic and Secure Internet (Spring 2012)
Green Growth: Getting the Policies Right (Winter 2011/2012)
Supply Chain Challenges (Fall 2011)
|
